ASSESSMENT TASK 3 MARKING CRITERIA | Good Grade Guarantee!
1 •11 1 11“111 • 1ASSESSMENT TASK 3 MARKING CRITERIA
Criteria 1 HD 1 D
1 с 1 р 1 N
Narrat@d PowerPoint (60%]., ,. н,ч! I! ‘,. ,., ., 111 ‘”””” 1″ “1 !
Persuasive language andtechniquesWeight ZO%
Demonstrates adwncedspoken persuosivecommunication ski/1s, withevidence о/:Sophisticated understandingand use of persuasivelanguage and techniques.Speaks with commandingauthority, conveyingconfidence and competence.Articulate prose. Engaging,speaking voice and manner.No errors on slides.
Demonstrates 11ery goodspoken persuasivecommunication ski/1s, withevidence о/:Comprehensiveunderstanding and use ofpersuasive language andtechniques. Very wellspoken, speaks withconfidence. Easy to listento, effective and engagingpresenter. Very few errorson slides.
Demonstrates sound spokenpersuasive communicatianski/1s, with evidence о/:Sound understanding anduse of persuasive languageand techniques. Presentskey message successfullywith largely logicalsequencing. Speaking voicesound and effective,exhiblts.some authority andmostly engaging. Someerrors on slides.
Demonstrates sati$factoryspoken persuasivecommunication skills, withevidence о/:Satisfactory understandingand use of persuasive/anguage and techniques.Satisfactory structure andengagement. Sequenceoccasionally confusing.Speaking voice neededsome consideration in parts(volume/pitc.h/pace) butheld audience attention forthe most part. Severalerrors on slides.
Demonstrates poor spokenpersuasive communicationskills, with evidence о/:Limited to no understandingand use of persuasivelanguage and techniques.Speaking voice difficult tounderstand most of thetime (volume/pitch/pace)or distracting backgroundnoise. Speaker lackedauthority or presence. Non•engaging presentation.Numerous errors on slides.
Development of persuasiveargumentWeight40%
Presents а sophisticated,effective argument thatflows logically. lncludes аclear proЫem statement andsolution that is addressedthrough а masterfulunderstanding of topic.
Presents а comprehensiveargument that is structuredand logical. /ncludes а verysound proЫem statementand solution that isaddressed through а verygood understanding oftopic.
Presents а sound argumentthat is mostly logical instructure.lncludes а sound proЫemstatement and solution thatis addressed through а goodunderstanding of topic.
Presents а generalargument, with а basicstructure. ProЫemstate!f}ent and solution arebasic or non-specific,demonstrating а superficiallevel of understanding oftopic.
Presents а vague orincomplete argument. Uttleor_no logical structure,difficult to follow. Lactssubject knowledge, oЫemstatement or solution.
Short written piece [40%)
Discussion ofconsiderations ofpreparation of proposalWelghtZ5%
А sophisticated discussion ofall necessary considerationsdemonstrating thoughtfuland insightful planning andpreparation was undertaken.
А comprehensive discussiondetailing almost al/considerationsdemonstrating very goodplanning and preparationwas undertaken.
А sound discussion of mostconsiderationsdemonstrating soundplanning and preparationwas undertaken.
А satisfactory discussion ofsome of the considerationsdemonstrating basicplanning and preparationwas undertaken.
An unsatisfactory discussionof а llmited number ofconsiderations made in thepreparation and delivery ofpresentation OR does notdescribe anyconsiderations.
..prPage 15 of 18
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL – NO PLAGIARISM.
- **REMEMBER TO PRECISE PAGE NUMBER**
- Hit The Order Button To Order A **Custom Paper**