COIT20249 Assessment Details | Good Grade Guarantee!
1COIT20249 Assessment DetailsAssessment item 3—Report
11.55 pm AEST, Friday, Week 10
2500 words +/- 250 words
ObjectivesPlease refer to the Unit Profile to see how this assessment item relates to the Unit Learning Outcomes.This assignment is designed to stimulate critical thinking outside of the classroom by requiring studentsto write a formal academic report. You will need to follow the ARE process described in chapters 2 and3 of Your Business Degree 2 (prescribed textbook for COIT20249) to analyse the assessment task,research relevant information and evaluate the information you find. This information should be used towrite an academic report in which you present your findings or outcomes and make recommendationsfor future practice. Professional writing and writing reports are described in chapters 4 and 5 of YourBusiness Degree 2. This assessment task will assess your skills in critical thinking, researchinginformation, forming an opinion, academic writing, logical ordering of ideas and your ability to supportyour arguments with quotes from literature. These objectives will be measured by the ‘closeness of fit’to meeting the assessment task, assessment requirements and marking criteria.Please note that there is a wealth of material available on the Moodle Unit website that you shoulduse to help you through the process of searching for and gathering relevant information, evaluatingthat information and writing your report.General Assessment CriteriaAssessments provide the opportunity for students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills to achievethe required standard. To do this, assessment responses need to be both clear and easy to understand. Ifnot, the University cannot determine that students have demonstrated their knowledge and skills.Assessments will, therefore, be marked accordingly including the potential for 0 (zero) marks whererelevant.The report must focus on the case study scenario given in the Assessment Task section. Any assessmentitems that do not address the case study scenario may be awarded 0 (zero) marks.If you use Track Changes when writing your report you must ensure that the submitted document is thefinal and correct version of the document. That is, if your submitted report contains Track Changes orComments or any other editing marks it may be awarded 0 (zero) marks. It is your responsibility tosubmit the final and correct version of your report.2The length of the report must be within the recommended range. If the report exceeds the maximumword count the marker will stop marking after 2750 words.Moodle auto-submits draft files that are in Moodle at the originally set deadlines. Files that are autosubmitted will not be reverted to draft status except in extenuating circumstances (evidence required). Itis your responsibility not to leave draft assessments in Moodle at the due date and time if the files arenot ready to be submitted for marking. However, late submissions may attract penalties.Assessment TaskStudents are required to write an academic report as per the format outlined in chapter 5 of thetextbook. The report must follow the CQU APA referencing style. See the American PsychologicalAssociation (APA) abridged guide updated Term 2 2018 available from:https://www.cqu.edu.au/student-life/services-and-facilities/referencing/cquniversity-referencingguides. Please note that the prescribed textbook uses APA referencing guidelines. See also theReferencing Style subsection below.The report is to be based on the following cybersecurity use case for office and home systems.With the recent progress of computer networks, growth of interconnected devices through Internet, cloudcomputing, big data and web services, the number of cyber threat/attack has grown exponentially.Malware attack, phishing, man-in-the middle attack, denial-of-service are some of the common types ofcyberattacks that hits businesses every day. Therefore, cybersecurity is an essential practice for thedigital age to protect systems, networks, applications, data/information and hardware from cyberattacksor unauthorised access, and to ensure the integrity, confidentiality, and availability of information. Thegoal is to prevent the risks to individuals and organisations such as, damage or loss of sensitive data,stolen money, theft of intellectual property, theft of personal and financial data, disruption to business.The major challenges to cybersecurity efforts are mobile connectivity, online payment, the everincreasing use of cloud and Internet of Things (IoT) devices, remote access and third-party outsourcing.These days almost every business has a website and externally exposed systems that make it easier forthe attackers to enter the internal networks. Moreover, most smart devices (both at home and at work)are connected to the Internet which makes the system prone to attack. Hence, ensuring cybersecurity isan absolute must for every business and also for individuals. Common types of cybersecurity areapplication security, hardware security, network security, cloud security, Data Loss Prevention (DLP),Cryptography, Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) and Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS), Identity andAccess Management (IAM), and Antivirus/anti-malware.You are a Security Consultant of a famous security consulting company that provides security consultingservices to a wide range of business, individual, education institutes and companies. Recently one of yourclients, ABC Technologies (ABCT) has contacted your organisation to prepare a document onCybersecurity as it was the recent victim of several cyberattacks.Here are the details of your client company:ABCT is an Australian technology company whose line of business ranges from different types hightech products which include both software and hardware. ABCT has multiple offices nationwide, andtwo overseas offices. All computer services are provided by virtual private network (VPN), which ismaintained in Canberra (the head office). ABCT allows their employees to work from home (using VPN3connections) and also have a Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) policy for their employees who workonsite. Each location also provides free wireless LAN access to visitors/guests. ABCT currently have10,000 regular customers. All their customer and product information are stored in the cloud. Becausethe company was the victim of several recent cyberattacks, they are concerned that company’s data mighthave been compromised and hackers might have gotten hold of customers’ information. They are alsoworried that they would lose the trust of their loyal customers, which could potentially result in a loss ofrevenue. So ABCT wants to improve their security system and security related policies. As a first step,they want your organisation to prepare a document on cybersecurity to train their staff on the basics ofcybersecurity. As part of that, your team leader asked you to research and write a report that shouldcover the following tasks:1. Explain what is cybersecurity and why it is important for ABCT?2. Identify and explain at least 3 security vulnerabilities in ABCT’s system (you need to considerABCT’s case as presented above). You need to justify your answer with evidence from research.3. Do some research, and find and list 5 different types of emerging threats (that might affect ABCT)and describe each of them in detail. In your discussion include what damage the attack mightcause, who is responsible for these attacks and their attack techniques.4. Do some research, analyse the information and give your recommendations (at least 3) how toprotect home and office from cyberattack.You have to complete this investigation and write a report for your team leader in the next three weeks.Since this is an initial investigation, moreover, some of the staff do not have IT background, the reportdoes not require in-depth technical details.Please note that you might need to make some assumptions about the organisation in order to writethis report. These assumptions should match the information in the case study and not contradict withthe objectives of the report. They should be incorporated in the introduction of your report when youdescribe the organisation and outline the problem to be solved. Relevant assumptions should beincorporated when addressing tasks 2 and 3 above. To avoid loss of marks, do not make assumptionsthat are not relevant or contradictory, or will not be used in your report discussion.Specifically your report should include the following (word count details are approximateguidelines):1. Title page: unit code and name, assessment number, report title, assessment due date, word count(actual), student name, student number, CQU email address, campus lecturer/tutor, and unitcoordinator. If applicable, add extension request ID and the new due date. Must be formatted to astandard required for a professional/business report. Check week 6 materials for example of aprofessionally formatted title page. Not included in the word count.2. Executive summary: should include the purpose of the report, the problem including key issuesconsidered and how they were investigated, your findings, and overview of your recommendations.4This part should be approximately three quarters of an A4 page but must not be longer than one (1)A4 page. Not included in the word count.3. Table of Contents (ToC): should list the report topics using decimal notation. Need to include themain headings and subheadings with corresponding page numbers, using a format that makes thehierarchy of topics clear. Because you are including a ToC the report pages should be numbered inthe footer as follows: title page has no page number; and main text to have Arabic numeralscommencing at 1. Create the ToC using MS Word’s ToC auto-generator rather than manuallytyping out the ToC. Instructions can be found here https://support.office.com/en-gb/article/Createa-table-of-contents-or-update-a-table-of-contents-eb275189-b93e-4559-8dd9-c279457bfd72#__create_a_table. Not included in the word count.4. Introduction: provide a brief description of the organisation as given in the case scenario includingany assumptions, a concise overview of the problem you have been asked to research, the mainaims/purpose of the report, the objectives to be achieved by writing the report (include the tasksoutlined in the case study) and how you investigated the problem. Provide an outline of the sectionsof the report. Should be approximately 250 words.5. Body of the report (use appropriate headings in the body of the report.): Define key terms you willuse in your report that are directly related to the problem and the technology considered. Then presentyour ideas on the topic and discuss the information you found in your research that was relevant tothe report’s objectives. Provide an analysis of the information that you gathered. Ensure that youexplore the tasks listed in the case study scenario.Do NOT use generic words such as ‘Body, Body of the Report, Tasks’ as section headings.Create meaningful headings and subheadings that reflect the topic and content of your report.Should be approximately 1850 words.6. Conclusion: restate the purpose of the report and key issues investigated and the related findingsbased on your research and analysis. Explain the significance of your findings for addressing theproblem stated in the case scenario and any limitations. State how your report has achieved itsobjectives and any future work to be considered. Should be approximately 250 words.7. Recommendations: 3 to 5 recommendations required. Format according to the Report WritingGuidelines discussed in the Unit. Should be approximately 150 words.8. Reference list. Not included in the word count.9. Appendices if necessary. Not included in the word count.Note: Additional information regarding this assignment may be placed on the Moodle Unit websiteas required. Check the Moodle Unit website at least once a week for further information relatingto the report. Regular access to the Moodle Unit website is a requirement of this Unit.Other Assessment RequirementsYour response should be structured as a report (chapter 5 of textbook), written in accordance withstandard academic writing principles (chapter 4 of textbook). The report must be written using your own5words with any in text citations clearly marked (see Referencing Style subsection below). You maydiscuss the assessment task with other students and the lecturing staff but you must WRITE the reportYOURSELF in your own words.You will need to conduct research to support your arguments using at least ten (10) but no more than15 current references. Note that all the references you choose to use should be evaluated using the TripleR framework in the research stage of preparing your Report (do NOT include this evaluation in theReport). You must have a minimum of ten (10) current references in your reference list. At least six (6)of these references should be from refereed academic journals and conference proceedings. Otherreferences could be sourced from books, industry websites and magazines. All sources should be currentthat is, within last 5 years. Minimum requirements relate to a Pass mark. You are encouraged to use morethan the minimum requirements (up to 15 for a HD mark for References 2 criterion) for a better qualityoutcome to your report through improving the quality of your analysis.The assignment should demonstrate a logical flow of discussion, and be free from typographical, spellingand grammatical errors. It should be prepared in MS-Word (or equivalent) using 12 point font (TimesNew Roman), 1.5 line spacing and margins of 2.54 cm. The final outcome must be clean and tidy.It is highly recommended that you submit your assignment to the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) ATLEAST ONE WEEK before the due date. The ALC can check your report for correct structure,referencing, paragraphing and some language issues.Referencing StyleYour report must include in-text referencing and a correctly cited list of references ordered alphabeticallyby surname of first author, in accordance with the CQU APA referencing style of referencing as referredto in the American Psychological Association (APA) abridged guide updated Term 1 2018 availablefrom: https://www.cqu.edu.au/student-life/services-and-facilities/referencing/cquniversity-referencingguides.The report must be written using your own words with any in text citations clearly acknowledged usingthe CQU APA referencing style.Helpful information on referencing techniques and styles can also be found on CQU’s referencingwebpage:https://www.cqu.edu.au/student-life/services-and-facilities/referencingMarks will be deducted for poor referencing, falsifying references, having less than ten (10) recentreferences, or for significant variations to the required word length.Use quotation marks for direct quotes and you must include the author, date and page number(s)with the quote as per the referencing standards.Academic IntegrityStudents must write the Report themselves. You may be asked to prove that you have written theReport. You should keep evidence that you have written the Report yourself, for example, earlydrafts of your Report, and annotated copies of references and notes of using the Triple R techniqueto evaluate the references. Once the assessment is marked, the Unit Coordinator (or nominee) may6request additional written information and/or an oral discussion to clarify the student’sunderstanding of the submitted work. Failure to comply and/or to demonstrate an understandingof the Report’s content could result in 0 marks for the Report.ALL assignments will be checked for plagiarism (material copied from other students and/ormaterial copied from other sources) using TurnItIn. If you are found to have plagiarised materialor if you have used someone else’s words without appropriate referencing, you will be penalisedfor plagiarism which could result in zero (0) marks for the whole assignment. If you falsifyreferences you will also be penalised. In some circumstances a more severe penalty may be imposedsuch as having a plagiarism incident raised.The University’s Academic Misconduct Procedure is available in the policy portalhttps://www.cqu.edu.au/policy.Useful information about academic integrity (avoiding plagiarism) can be found in the ALC resourceson the Moodle Unit website and at:https://www.cqu.edu.au/student-life/services-and-facilities/referencinghttps://www.cqu.edu.au/student-life/services-and-facilities/referencing/cquniversity-referencing-guidesGuidelines with respect to self-referencing are available on the COIT20249 Moodle website.SubmissionThe report has to be submitted using the COIT20249 Moodle Unit website on or before the due date. Thesubmission link can be accessed through the Assessment block.Before submitting your assignment, you should check it against the detailed assessment criteria in thefollowing table to ensure that you have satisfactorily addressed all the criteria that will be used to markyour report.It is your responsibility to ensure that your report is submitted for grading. At the due date of theassessment Moodle will auto-submit files that have been uploaded and left as drafts. However, any filesuploaded after the due date must be manually submitted. This means that if you have been granted anextension or are uploading a late assessment (after the due date) you must complete the Moodlesubmission process. Further details on completing the submission process are available via the ‘MoodleHelp for Students’ link in the Support block of your Moodle website.If your report is left as a draft in Moodle after the due date it will accrue a late penalty. Late submissionsattract a penalty of 5% per day of the total available mark for the individual assessment item. See theAssessment Policy and Procedure – Higher Education Coursework in the policy portalhttps://www.cqu.edu.au/policy.Note: if your Report is auto-submitted the submission will not be reverted to draft unless there areextenuating circumstances. Any request is to go to the Unit Coordinator and must be supported byevidence.7Marking CriteriaThis assessment is criterion referenced which means your work is assessed against the criteria in the marking rubric below.
The executive summary contained:– a brief description of the purpose of the report– the definition of the problem, key issuesexplored, and how they were investigated– a summary of what you found and what youconcluded– overview of your recommendations– meets the recommended length as in given thespecifications.
The executive summarycontained the propersections and generallywell written but there issome room forimprovement.
The executivesummary hadsections which weretoo brief. Did notinclude enoughdetail.
The executive summarylacked clarity and hasincomplete or missingsections. It did notclearly explain theproblem, how it wasinvestigated and yourrecommendations.
Entire sections of the executivesummary are missing. There is a lackof detail and the problem is not wellexplained.Executive summary too short or long –did not meet the structuralrequirements in the specifications
Table of contents
Lists the report topics using decimal notation.Includes meaningful main headings andsubheadings with corresponding page numbers.Format makes the hierarchy of topics clear.Auto generated using MS Word.All pages are numbered in the report
All the headings andsubheadings are presentin the table of contentswith correctcorresponding pagenumber. But there issome room forimprovementPages are numbered inthe report.
Some things missingfrom the table ofcontents.Pages are numberedin the report
Includes the mainheadings only.Pages are numbered inthe report
Table of contents missing or verypoorly done.Pages are not numbered in the report.
Set the scene for the report; gave somebackground information for the topic. Included abrief description of the organisation.
The introductioncontained the properparts but there is roomfor improvement.
The introduction hadparts which were toobrief.Did not includeenough detail.
The introduction lackedclarityHad a number ofincomplete or missingparts.
The introduction was missing or was arepeat of the executive summary.It did not clearly introduce the report.
Stated the objectives of the investigation. Includedthe problem you are addressing and the key issuesto be explored.Explained the research method used to gatherinformation.Outlined the sections of the report.
It did not clearlyintroduce the report.
Introduction too short or long – did notmeet the structural requirements in thespecifications
Body of theReport: Selectionand sequencing ofsubject material;including evidence.
Selected exact amount of relevant material thatsupports argument with no contradictions.Substantial, logical, & concrete development ofideas. Arguments were logical and clear.All tasks in the specifications addressed.Assumptions were made explicit. Key terms weredefined.Details were germane, original, and convincinglyinterpreted.
Selected large amount ofrelevant material.Offered soliddevelopment of ideas butless original reasoning.Most of the tasks in thespecifications wereaddressed.Assumptions were notalways recognised ormade explicit. Key termswere defined.Contained someappropriate details orexamples.
Selected adequateamount of relevantmaterial.Some developmentof ideas; not muchoriginal reasoning.Some of the tasks inthe specificationswere addressed.Assumptions are notalways recognised ormade explicit. MostKey terms weredefined.Contains someappropriate details orexamples.Contains someappropriate details orexamples.
Selected adequateamount of material notall of it relevant.Not much developmentof ideas. Very littleoriginal reasoning.Only a few tasks wereaddressed.Offered somewhatobvious support that maybe too broad.Some Key terms defined.Details were too general,not interpreted, irrelevantto problem, orinappropriatelyrepetitive.
Selected too little material or materialthat is irrelevant.No development of ideas or originalreasoning.Minimal addressing of tasks related tothe report topic. No key topics defined.Offered simplistic, undeveloped, orcryptic support for the ideasKey information not supported by anyevidence.Inappropriate or off-topicgeneralisations, faulty assumptions,errors of fact.
Problem restated clearly, main points andsupporting arguments summarised.Stated the significance of the findings and that theobjectives of the report had been met.No new material.
The conclusioncontained the properparts but did not includeenough detail.No new material.
The conclusion hadparts which were toobrief or missing. Didnot include enoughdetail.May have includedsome new material.
The conclusion lackedclarity and hadincomplete or missingparts.It did not clearlyconclude the report.
The conclusion is missing or was arepeat of the executive summary.Conclusion was difficult to understandor not linked to the overall purpose ofthe Report.Included new material.
May have included somenew material.
Conclusion too short or long – did notmeet the structural requirements in thespecifications
Suggested 3 specific actions to address theproblem.Actions were clearly based on the findings of thereport.
Suggested 3 specificactions relevant to theproblem. Actions werebased on the findings ofthe report but there issome room forimprovement
Suggested 2-3actions that wererelevant to theproblem.Not all actions werebased on the findingsof the report.
Suggested at least 2actions. Not all actionswere relevant to theproblem.Not all actions werebased on the findings ofthe report.
Recommendations missing orirrelevant to the problem and/or did notrelate to the findings.
Organisation andstructure of theReport:– ideas/main points;– grammar,punctuation andspelling; and– structure ofsentences andparagraphs.
Sequence of ideas was effective.Excellent sentence structure. Well-constructedparagraphs; clear linkages between paragraphs.Written expression was clear and correct;Grammar excellent; correct use of punctuation;minimal or no spelling errors; and evidence ofthorough proof-reading.Observed professional conventions of writtenEnglish and report format.
Sequence of ideas wasgood.Good sentence structure.Linkages betweenparagraphs were mostlyappropriate.A few errors ingrammar. Madeoccasional problematicword choices or syntaxerrors. A few spelling orpunctuation errors.Observed professionalconventions of writtenEnglish and reportformat; made a fewminor or technicalerrors.
Sequence of ideasdid not always flowin a logical manner.Some good sentencestructure. Linkagesbetween paragraphscould be improved.Some brief,undevelopedparagraphs.Some distractinggrammatical errors.Errors in punctuationand spelling. Littleevidence of proofreading.Needed to observeprofessionalconventions ofwritten English andreport format; madefew errors.
May have had abruptshifts and ineffectiveflow of ideas.Some awkwardsentences; paragraphsnot well linked.Paragraph structure notwell integrated;contained extraneousinformation.Some major grammaticalor proofreading errors.Language frequentlyweakened by inexactword choices. Spellingerrors.Needed to observeprofessional conventionsof written English andreport format; maderepeated errors.
Poorly worded sentences. No linkagesbetween paragraphs.Showed minimal effort or lack ofcomprehension of the assignment.Numerous major grammatical andspelling errors which seriouslydetracted from understanding thewriting; or incomprehensible.Did not meet professional conventionsof written English and report format.Evidence of poor planning and/or noserious revision of writing.
Report Layout– Title page;– length andformatting.
Title page contained all necessary information.Correct length as specified.Tidy final version – including no, track changes orunnecessary spacing or indentations, correctalignment of sections.Formatted using 12 point font (Times NewRoman), 1.5 line spacing and margins of 2.54 cm.
Title page contained allnecessary information.Correct length within +/-100 – 200 words of therequired length.Mostly tidy final versionFormatted correctly butmissed one keyrequirement.
Title page containedall necessaryinformation.Reasonable lengthwithin +/-200 – 300words of therequired length.Tidy final version.Some minorformatting errors.
Some necessaryinformation was missingfrom the title page.Outside the 10% ofrequired length – within+/-300 – 500 words ofthe required length.Can improve the finalversion appearance.Major errors informatting.
Title page missing or missingnecessary information.Too short (<2000 words or too long>3000 words).Extensive improvements need toensure good layout. Formattedincorrectly.
References (1):Evidence ofresearch andanalysis of thereferences based onthe AREframework.Selection and useof references basedon the Triple Rframework(relevant, reliable,and reputable).
Thorough research indicated; clear well-thoughtout analysis clearly integrated into discussion.Analysed and evaluated information in greatdepth.Used references to support, extend, and inform,but not substitute writer’s own development ofideas.Combined material from a variety of sources.Did not overuse quotes.All references conformed to the Triple Rframework and recent (within the last 5 years).
Research was generallythorough; analysis wasgenerally well done;integrated intodiscussion.Analysed and evaluatedinformation inconsiderable depth.Used references tosupport, but notsubstitute writer’s owndevelopment of ideas.Combined material froma variety of sources.Did not overuse quotes.Most referencesconformed to the TripleR framework and allwere recent (within thelast 5 years).
Some evidence ofresearch; basicanalysis; someintegration intodiscussion.Analysed andevaluatedinformation inreasonable depth,some description.Used references tosupport, but notsubstitute writer’sown development ofideas.Combined materialfrom a few sources.Did not overusequotes.More than 50% ofthe referencesconformed to theTriple R frameworkand recent (withinthe last 5 years).
Basic research;weaknesses evident inanalysis.Little evidence ofanalysis and evaluationof information;recounted and described.Used relevant referencesbut lacked in variety ofreferences and/or theskilful combination ofreferences.Combined material froma few sources.Quotations andparaphrases may be toolong or not wellintegrated into the text.Most of the referencesdid NOT conform to theTriple R framework orwere NOT recent (olderthan the last 5 years).
Little or no evidence of research andanalysis of information.Neglected important referencesrelevant to the problem.Inappropriate or off-topicgeneralisations, faulty assumptions,errors of fact.Overused quotations or paraphrasing tosubstitute writer’s own ideas.Possibly used source material withoutacknowledgement.Selected references did NOT conformto the Triple R framework – includingmuch older than the last 5 years.
References (2): Intext citations andreference list.• Currentreferences –published withinlast 5 years;
More than ten current references 14 – 15*.Approximately 60% or more of the referenceswere academic references; All of sources are verywell reputed.Thorough referencing. Citations and reference listaccurate and consistent with APA referencingstyle.All citations/references listed.*Note: Use of more than 15 references notpenalised but no extra marks. Excessive numberof references may impact on the originaldevelopment of ideas and hence marks to othercriteria.
More than ten current(up to 13) referencesincluding more than sixacademic references. Notall of the sources arevery well reputed.All citations/referenceslisted.
At least ten currentreferences includingat least six academicsources.Some errors in APAreferencing style forcitations and/orreference list.Allcitations/referenceslisted.
At least ten currentreferences but less thansix academic references.Some errors with APAreferencing style.Incomplete reference list.References not citedproperly in text.
Less than ten current references.None or only one or two academicreferences.Inconsistent with APA referencingstyle.Significant problems with citations andreferences.
The content of the report was unable to be read and understood by the marker and another independent reviewer. Therefore, the assessment will receive a 0 markwithout further feedback.
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL – NO PLAGIARISM.
- **REMEMBER TO PRECISE PAGE NUMBER**
- Hit The Order Button To Order A **Custom Paper**