Design Thinking for Managers

MGMT20140 Design Thinking for Managers
Australian Expert Writers
T2 2019
Assessment 2 (Group presentation and report) assessment criteria
Presentation:
Ability to describe and critically evaluate a minimum of 10 suitable Design Thinking tools/techniques that your group has utilised, alongside their outcomes (15%)
Presentation of evidence that your group has utilised these tools/techniques (15%)
Ability to identify how far your group has progressed in their Design Thinking process (5%)
Demonstrate a breadth and quality of research by using a minimum of 10 academic sources (5%)
Correct use of the APA referencing system (5%)
Ability to work co-operatively in a work-based team to prepare a professional presentation (appropriate personal professional standards in terms of dress, verbal and non-verbal communication consistent with standards expected of professional leaders and managers in the work context) in the nominated format (5%)
Report:
Ability to critically evaluate own Design Thinking experience (15%)
Demonstrate a wider understanding of Design Thinking tools/phases by the use of reflection and critique. (20%)
Ability to construct a complete and professional report in the nominated format consistent with standards expected of professional leaders and managers in the work context (5%)
Demonstrate a breadth and quality of research by using a minimum of 10 high-quality academic sources (5%)
Correct use of the APA referencing system (5%)
See Moodle for more detailed assessment rubric. Late submission and academic misconduct penalties apply as per the university regulations. As Masters students you are required to engage in research as per the Australia Quality Framework (AQF) guidelines. Two specific requirements need to be considered. Students need to demonstrate “a body of knowledge that includes the understanding of recent developments in a discipline and/or area of professional practice, and demonstrate “knowledge of research principles and methods applicable to a field of work and/or learning”. Each unit in your course has a number of required weekly readings in terms of academic texts, journals and business publications that represent the appropriate body of knowledge and recent developments referred to by the AQF. In order to demonstrate the ability to engage in appropriate research, students should read and utilise these texts and journals and publications, and as Masters students, indicate a willingness to research beyond this minimum standard through additional texts, journals and studies that demonstrate an ability to engage in independent research. Students should insure that they understand the specific research that is required for each assessment piece and recognise that if they meet this minimum requirement, you will receive the minimum grade for demonstrated research. Your attention is drawn to the University’s stated position on plagiarism. THE WORK OF OTHERS, WHICH IS INCLUDED IN THE ASSIGNMENT MUST BE ATTRIBUTED TO ITS SOURCE (a full list of references must be submitted as part of the assessment).

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM - CUSTOM PAPER

Recent Completed and delivered Papers

# Topic title Subject Area Academic Level Pages delivered
6
Writer's choice
Business
University
2
1 hour 32 min
7
Wise Approach to
Philosophy
College
2
2 hours 19 min
8
1980's and 1990
History
College
3
2 hours 20 min
9
pick the best topic
Finance
School
2
2 hours 27 min
10
finance for leisure
Finance
University
12
2 hours 36 min