>> CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS FROM AustralianExpertWriters.com <<

Perception Analysis

Perception Analysis
This assessment task is designed to increase your awareness of the effect communication has on the safety and quality of an individual’s experience with the health care system, in this case, the experience of an Aboriginal person.Using your understanding of the interpersonal communication literature, you will complete an analysis of the consumers experience with the health care system. You are expected to support all components of your discussion with references (in-text and in thereference list) from scholarly, academic papers form journals and/or textbooks.What are the consequences of bias for a nurse’s ability to provide culturally safe and respectful nursing care for Aboriginal patients? Discussion should include reference to cultural safety and Indigenous cultural respect and how we can address any imbalance inour personal views and personal bias and our ability to provide non-judgmental and empathic and compassionate care to all our patients.

Well Developed
Analysis of communicationskills in the scenariorecounting the interactionwith the health care system.skills could have beenemployed differentlyincluding suggestedalternatives.(20)
Comprehensive discussion of componentsof communication used in the scenario.Sophisticated understanding of limitationsof skills used and examples of alternatecommunication skills that could have beenemployed. Specific examples included tosupport limited responses and alternateresponses. High level thought evident.Comprehensive discussion of possiblebarriers to communication in the scenarioand supported by the literature.High quality research evidence presentedand well integrated with examples from theinterview.(18‐20)
Discussion of components ofcommunication used in the scenario.Good understanding of limitations ofcommunication and barriers tocommunication provided with specificexamples from the scenarios of limitedresponses and suggestions for alternateresponses.Research evidence presented andintegrated with examples from thescenario.(15 ‐17)
Some discussion on components ofcommunication skills used in the scenario.Demonstrates a basic understanding of thecommunication skills used.Barriers to communication provided.Limited understanding of the limitations ofthe communication in the scenario andlimited alternate responses suggested.(10 ‐14)
Is primarily a descriptive recount of thescenario with limited or no analysis.Poor discussion on communication skills.Demonstrates a superficial understanding ofthe communication skills.Does not demonstrate understanding of thelimitations of the skills used in scenario orsuggest alternate communication skills.(0 ‐10)
Consequences of personal biasfor culturally safe andrespectful care(10)
There is a comprehensive discussion of theconsequences personal bias can have forthe ability to provide culturally safe andrespectfulcare. Insight into their responsibility fortheir own practice is demonstrated.Discussion of cultural safety and Indigenouscultural respect is supported by literature.(9‐10)
The consequences of personal bias for theability to provide culturally safe and respectfulcare is discussed. Responsibility for their ownpractice has been mentioned. Discussion ofcultural safety and Indigenous cultural respectis supported by literature.(7‐8)
There has been an attempt to discuss theconsequences personal bias can have forculturally safe and respectful care however,discussion is general and not personalised tothe student’s own practice and/or thediscussion of cultural safety and Indigenouscultural respect has only been minimallysupported by literature or theory.(5 ‐6)
There is a poor attempt to discuss theconsequences personal bias can have forculturally safe and respectful care and/or thereis no literature to support the discussion ofcultural safety and Indigenous cultural respect.(0 – 4)
Ability to portray peoplesensitively in writing.(5)
Writing is sensitive to how people arerepresented. All language used in the essay isappropriate regarding history, society, naming,culture, spirituality and classifications ofAboriginal Peoples.( 5)
Writing is sensitive to how people arerepresented. Terminology referring toAboriginal Peoples is mostly correct andproper nouns are capitalised.(4)
An effort has been made to portray peoplesensitively however, inadvertent errors havebeen made.(3)
Writing is insensitive to how people arerepresented.(0 – 2)
Demonstration of effectivewritten communication thatadheres to the conventions ofacademic writing.(10)
Very well written with proper grammar,paragraph and sentence structure. Argumentsare insightful.Cited sources are integratedflawlessly into the text and included in the fullreference list. In‐text citations and thereference list are formatted according toHarvard UTS. All references are from reputablesources. Several additional references areprovided from reputable sources.(9 – 10)
Well written with acceptable grammar,paragraph and sentence structure.Cited sources are integrated into the text. Eachreference appears in a final reference listformatted according to Harvard UTS. Theremay be minor errors in either the citationand/or referencing formatting. All referencesare from reputable sources.(7 – 8)
The essay has captured most of the main ideashowever, the standard of writing detracts fromthe readers understanding.Cited sources are integrated into the text.References appear in a final reference listformatted according to Harvard UTS. There is asuperficial attempt to reference and/or thereare major errors in either the citation and/orreferencing formatting.(5 ‐6)
The essay is poorly written.There are less than 5 references integrated intothe text and/or sources are mostly web basedand not from scholarly literature and/or thereare major formatting issues that imply thestudent has made no attempt to follow HarvardUTS formatting.( 0 – 4 )
Australian Expert Writers
 Level of discussion oncommunication skillsemployed Analysis of how these Discussion of barriersto communication