We can Help on: MNG03236 Tourism & Hotel Professional DevelopmentBSBHRM506 – Manage recruitmentASB 4115 Management ResearchBSB51918 – Diploma of Leadership and ManagementEG7036 International Business, Organisational managementresearch of meaningful use objectivesAssignment 1: Conceptual Modelwishes to prepare cash budget from JanuaryCriteria used in marking Assignments

SOLVED BY  Expert Writers

MNG03236 Tourism & Hotel Professional Development
Assessment 1: Employment Application – 30%
Student:
Mark: /100
Marker:
Resubmit due date (if required)*:
Date Marked:
* Scoring 3 or below for spelling/grammar on any part will require a resubmission
5
Outstanding
4
Better than adequate
3
Competent
2
Basic
1
Needs refining
0
Poor
Email – 15 marks
Layout
Highly professional
layout includes:
greeting; purpose;
correctly addressed;
signature block, subject
line and attachment
names as per UIG; two
attachments;
persuasive closing
remark and closing.
One paragraph long.
Professional layout
with most elements:
greeting; purpose;
correctly addressed;
signature block &
subject line as per UIG;
two attachments;
closing remark and
closing. One paragraph
long.
Good layout with most
elements including:
greeting; purpose;
signature block &
subject line as per
UIG/assessment
instructions;
attachment/s; closing
remark and closing.
Two-three sentences.
Inexpert layout with at
least three of the
following: greeting;
purpose; signature
block & subject line as
per UIG/assessment
instructions; closing
remark and closing.
Less than two
sentences in length.
Poor layout but at least
two of the following
included: greeting;
purpose; signature
block and/or subject
line as per
UIG/assessment
instructions; closing
remark and closing.
Too brief/short in
length.
No email text/ text
does not address any of
the assessment criteria.
Persuasiveness
Highly persuasive
content including a
‘hook’ (competency
statement) that is
specific for the role.
Persuasive content
including a ‘hook’
(competency
statement) that is
specific for the role.
Content includes a
‘hook’ (competency
statement). Scope for
it to be further tailored
to the role.
Does not include a
competency statement;
role or organisation
suggested but scope to
be more explicit.
Content does not
include a competency
statement; no role or
organisation
mentioned.
No email text/ text
does not have any
persuasive elements.
Spelling / grammar /
typos / punctuation *
No spelling errors,
perfect punctuation
including of pronouns,
name/s and degree
name, is grammatically
perfect and
consistently spaced;
one-two fonts
consistently used.
Spell checked and
grammatically correct.
Less than two errors
that do not detract
from meaning or
persuasiveness.
Writing contains a few
spelling mistakes or
grammatical errors.
These detract from the
message/suggest poor
attention to detail.
Contains several
spelling and
punctuation mistakes
that detract from
meaning and
persuasiveness.
.
Clear failure to spell
check, several
sentences fail to have
verbs, are poorly
punctuated, written in
point form and/or
paragraphs have only
one sentence etc.
Very poor spelling and
grammar that makes it
difficult to ascertain
meaning.
Application Letter – 30 marks
Appropriate content
Five paragraph format
with correct details
(e.g. availability, degree
name); min. two
competency
statements; appeal of
role, areas of interest
and call to further
action.
Five paragraph format
with correct details,
one-two competency
statements; appeal of
role, areas of interest
and call to further
action.
Content follows five
paragraph format and
contains most required
details, includes at
least one competency
statement. Scope for it
to be further tailored to
the role.
No or basic
competency statement;
role or organisation
suggested, but scope to
be more explicit;
limited personal
details/attempt to
establish fit.
Does not include a
competency statement;
no role or organisation
mentioned, not tailored
to the role.
Not included/no
details.
Flow / Readability
Persuasively connects
ideas and arguments in
and between sentences
and paragraphs;
meaning and message
is very clear.
Connects ideas and
arguments in sentences
and paragraphs;
meaning and message
is clear.
Ideas and arguments
are communicated in
well-structured
sentences and
paragraphs. Clear
message.
Attempts to connect
words and ideas
although meaning is
sometimes unclear or
invisible.
Does not demonstrate
an understanding of
what is expected in
business letter writing.
Meaning and message
cannot be discerned.
Engaging, persuasive
and positive in tone
Highly persuasive,
engaging and positive
in tone; content
tailored to the role.
Persuasive, engaging
and positive in tone,
content tailored to the
role.
Clearly describes
appeal of the
organisation and/or
role and is positive in
tone.
Limited use of
persuasive elements,
e.g. areas of
organisation and call to
further action.
Attempts but fails to
convey enthusiasm
and/or is negative
overall.
No persuasive
elements.
Length & layout
Max. one A4 page,
single-spaced; business
letter format as per
template; uses a
section break; no
footer or page number;
electronic signature;
before your résumé.
Max. one A4 page,
single-spaced; business
letter format; minor
issue with either
section break or
footer/page number;
before your résumé.
Max. one A4 page,
single-spaced; business
letter format as per
template; uses a
section break; no
footer or page number;
before your résumé.
Too short or long;
poorly formatted with
limited or incorrect
organisation or
personal details; does
not follow template;
does not use a section
break; uses footer or
page number.
Too short or long; does
not follow template; no
section break; use
footer and/or page
number; before your
résumé.
Not included/no
details.
Effectively targeted at
securing an
internship/
employment
Clear on whether
applying for an
internship or graduate
role; written in
response to an
advertised position; all
details including:
date/location of
advert/
source/internship
conditions/start date
and/fit clearly noted.
Clear on whether
applying for an
internship or graduate
role; written in
response to an
advertised position;
most details including:
date/location of
advert/
source/internship
conditions/start date
and/fit clearly noted.
Attempts to be clear on
whether applying for
an internship or
graduate role; written
in response to an
advertised position;
some details including:
date/location of
advert/
source/internship
conditions/start date
and/fit noted.
Unclear on whether
applying for an
internship or graduate
role; written in
response to an
advertised position;
limited details
including:
date/location of
advert/
source/internship
conditions/start date
and/fit noted.
Unclear on type or role
applying for; limited
supporting details such
as: date/location of
advert/
source/internship
conditions/start date
and/fit noted.
Not effectively targeted
at securing an
internship/
employment.
Spelling/grammar/
typos/punctuation*
No spelling errors,
perfect punctuation
including of pronouns
name/s and degree
name, is grammatically
perfect and
consistently spaced;
one font.
Spell checked and
grammatically correct.
Less than two errors
that do not detract
from meaning or
persuasiveness.
Writing contains more
than two spelling
mistakes or
grammatical errors.
These detract from the
message/suggest poor
attention to detail.
Contains several
spelling and
punctuation mistakes
that detract from
meaning and
persuasiveness.
.
Clear failure to spell
check, several
sentences fail to have
verbs, are poorly
punctuated, written in
point form and/or
paragraphs have only
one sentence etc.
Very poor spelling and
grammar that makes it
difficult to ascertain
meaning.
Resume – 40 marks
Appropriate content
Highly persuasive
content tailored to the
role that includes: all
personal contact
details, previous
education, work
history and skills.
Persuasive content
tailored to the role that
includes: personal
contact details,
previous education,
work history and skills.
Good content tailored
to the role with most
details included for:
personal contact
details, previous
education, work
history and skills
included.
Content is basic, and
does not adequately
convey fit for the role.
Reasonable
presentation of
personal contact
details, previous
education, work
history and/or skills.
Content does not
convey fit for the role.
Poor presentation of:
personal contact
details and/or previous
education and/or work
history and/or skills.
Very poor/no content.
Reverse
chronological order
Employment history
and qualifications
sections are in reverse
chronological order
with month/year for
all.
Employment history
and qualifications
sections are in reverse
chronological order.
Minor issue/s with
month/year.
Good attempt to put
employment history
and qualifications
sections in reverse
chronological order.
Reverse chronological
order of at least one
section is correct.
Some months included.
Month/year or year not
included for most
items; chronological
order is not attempted.
No dates included.
Results or
achievements
focused
Highly persuasive
indication of results
achieved/uses positive
characteristics to
describe duties.
Quantifies or provides
evidence for most of
these.
Persuasive use of
positive characteristics
to describe
duties/indicate of
results. Quantifies or
provides evidence for
some of these.
Good attempt to
include positive
characteristics and/or
action words to
describe
duties/indicate results.
Limited use of positive
characteristics and/or
action words to
describe
duties/indicate results.
No attempt to use
positive characteristics
and/or action words to
describe
duties/indicate results.
No duties listed.
Headings
Highly consistent and
effective use of font
style and size,
punctuation, alignment
and spacing.
Headings mostly use
consistent font style
and size, punctuation,
alignment and spacing.
Good headings with
several inconsistencies
in application of font
style and size,
punctuation, alignment
and spacing.
Many inconsistencies
in application of
heading font, font size,
punctuation alignment
and spacing.
Attempts to include
headings but these are
ineffectively and /or
inexpertly applied.
Does not include
appropriate headings.
Footer
Uses footer with name
and page number on
pages two and three.
Consistently and well
formatted.
Uses footer with name
and page number on
pages two and three.
Minor formatting
issues.
Uses footer/page no.
on all pages and/or not
correctly numbered/no
name.
Footer includes at least
one element: page
no./name but is on all
pages/not correctly
numbered/no name.
Footer includes page
number but is also on first
page. No name.
No relevant details in
footer.
Referees
Includes three recent
and relevant referees
with full details: first
name, surname,
position title,
organisation, phone
and email.
Includes three referees
with full details: first
name, surname,
position title,
organisation, phone
and email.
Includes three referees
with most details: i.e.
first name, surname,
position title,
organisation, phone
and email.
Too many/too few
referees with limited
relevance/recency
and/or some are
missing details: i.e. first
name, surname,
position title,
organisation, phone
and email.
Too many/too few
referees with no
apparent
relevance/recency
and/or many missing
details: i.e. first name,
surname, position title,
organisation, phone
and email.
No referees listed.
Overall layout /
aesthetics / length
Max. three A4 pages,
consistent line
spacing/tabs/tables;
not more than 2-3
contemporary
fonts/font sizes;
excellent use of white
space.
Max. three A4 pages,
limited issues with:
spacing/tabs/tables;
no. of fonts/font sizes;
very good use of white
space.
Max. three A4 pages,
several inconsistencies
in use of
spacing/tabs/tables;
fonts/font sizes and
white space.
Too short or long;
many inconsistencies
in use of
spacing/tabs/tables;
fonts/font sizes and
white space that
detract from appeal.
Too short or long; does
not use of word
processing features
effectively. Lacks
appeal.
Not included/no
details.
Spelling/grammar/
typos/punctuation*
No spelling errors,
perfect punctuation
including of pronouns,
name/s and degree
name, is grammatically
perfect and
consistently spaced;
one font.
Spell checked and
grammatically correct.
Less than two errors
that do not detract
from meaning or
persuasiveness.
Writing contains more
than two spelling
mistakes or
grammatical errors.
These detract from the
message/suggest poor
attention to detail.
Contains several
spelling and
punctuation mistakes
that detract from
meaning and
persuasiveness.
Clear failure to spell
check, several
sentences fail to have
verbs, are poorly
punctuated, written in
point form and/or
paragraphs have only
one sentence etc.
Very poor spelling and
grammar that makes it
very difficult to
ascertain meaning.
Response to selection criterion – 15 marks
Structure – STAR
framework
Selection criterion
chosen is highly
credible; persuasively
describes the situation,
task, action and
response. Evidence is
quantified or clearly
described.
Selection criterion
chosen is credible;
persuasively describes
the situation, task,
action and response.
Evidence is quantified
or clearly described.
Reasonable choice of
selection criterion;
clearly describes the
situation, task, action
and response. Evidence
for this is clear.
Unclear or generic
selection criterion;
attempt to present
evidence according to
the STAR framework
but lacking in
persuasiveness.
Unclear or generic
selection criterion;
evidence presented
does not conform to
STAR framework.
No criterion/does not
use STAR framework
for response.
Flow / Readability /
Length
Persuasively connects
ideas and arguments in
1-2 paragraphs;
creatively interprets
distinguishes between
opinion and theory and
supports assertions
with appropriate
evidence or examples.
Clearly connects ideas
and arguments in
sentences in 1-2
paragraphs; credibly
distinguishes between
opinion and theory by
thoughtful use of
examples.
Ideas and arguments
are communicated in
well-structured
sentences and
paragraphs; meaning is
coherent; at least one
example provided.
Attempts to connect
words and ideas
although meaning is
sometimes unclear or
invisible. Possibly too
long/short.
Does not demonstrate
competence in
constructing a sentence
or connecting ideas
within paragraphs.
Possibly too
long/short.
Very poor written
expression that makes
it difficult to ascertain
meaning.
Spelling/grammar/
typos/punctuation*
No spelling errors,
perfect punctuation
including of pronouns
name/s and degree
name, is grammatically
perfect and
consistently spaced;
one font.
Spell checked and
grammatically correct.
Less than two errors
that do not detract
from meaning or
persuasiveness.
Writing contains more
than two spelling
mistakes or
grammatical errors.
These detract from the
message/suggest poor
attention to detail.
Contains several
spelling and
punctuation mistakes
that detract from
meaning and
persuasiveness.
Clear failure to spell
check, several
sentences fail to have
verbs, are poorly
punctuated, written in
point form and/or
paragraphs have only
one sentence etc.
Very poor spelling and
grammar that makes it
difficult to ascertain
meaning.
Other Comments:
Dear
Kind regards
NB: I have used the Track Changes function of Microsoft Word to mark – so you will need to accept/delete all changes AND delete all comments before saving
again (and sending to recruiters) otherwise these comments will show.
**********************************************************
Your email (with my comments)

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER