Foundations of Social Innovation
SOLUTION AT Australian Expert Writers
Foundations of Social InnovationAssignment 1: Written AssessmentAssessment Due Date: Week 6 Friday (28 Aug. 2020) 12:00 pm AESTPlease note that the time for submission is the middle of the day. This provides the opportunity for the unit coordinator and TASAC to assist students who may have difficulties submitting their assignments.
Describe and analyse a ‘wicked problem’ of either national or global relevance. Canvass at least one campaign, policy approach or intervention that has been launched to overcome this problem, evidence the degree to which this succeeded, and identify and provide evidence of at least one unintended consequence of this attempt to address the problem.
The assignment should not exceed 2000 words, and should draw on credible written evidence, including scholarly books and articles, non-scholarly books and book chapters, and credible media sources (a minimum of 10 scholarly references are required). This assignment requires you to show evidence that you understand the term ‘wicked problem’ and are able to relate that definition to a ‘real world’ wicked problem, using evidence you’ve gathered through your own readings of the scholarly or other science literature. You can make use of reputable media sources as part of your case, but a preference should be given to either scholarly (peer-reviewed) papers, scientific reports (e.g. from United Nations bodies or the CSIRO), or government or reputable non-government reports. Unintended consequences of policy solutions are not easy to find, therefore we encourage you to think through what MIGHT be an unintended (negative or positive) consequence to a campaign designed to tackle a wicked problem. Once you have identified a likely candidate for an unintended consequence, then you should be able to find some plausible good quality evidence to show that such a consequence may have transpired.
The format of this assignment is a formal essay or report. There is no ‘right’ structure, but the assessment item should be clearly and logically structured, and can be illustrated with graphs, figures or tables as required. Using sub-headings to help organise your work is encouraged, but not required.
Critical Insight (15 marks)
To what degree have you explored the problem and its underlying causes?To what degree have you explored the campaign, policy approach or intervention that has been launched to overcome this problem?To what degree have you been able to identify a likely or evidenced unintended consequence or consequences?
Evidence (10 marks)
Is this insight linked to evidence drawn from quality sources (as defined in the task description?Has a minimum of ten such quality sources been properly used (that is understood, discussed, and referenced)?Have you demonstrated the ability to evaluate the quality of the evidence?
Presentation and communication (5 marks)
Have you presented the wicked problem, responses and unintended consequences in a clear way?Have you checked your work and ensured it has minimal errors and is consistently and clearly formatted?In cases where you have used additional materials (e.g. graphs), do these additional materials add value to your case?Does your submission show appropriate and accurate (APA) referencing?
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA Ph. D. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER