HRMT20024 | Good Grade Guarantee!
HRMT20024, T3 2019 – Assessment 2 Review of the Literature Guidelines Due date Week 5 Friday (20 December. 2019) 11:45 pm AEST Any requests for extension must be submitted through the CQU system at least 48 hours prior to the due date, with relevant supporting documents. Late submissions without approval will result in a penalty of 5% (1.5 marks) per day. Weighting 30% Length 2,500 words ± 10% Learning outcomes 1, 2, 3, 4 Assessment Purpose The primary purpose of this assessment is to enhance students’ research, analysis and referencing skills. The secondary purpose is to give students the opportunity to demonstrate their critical thinking and written communication skills. The third purpose is to demonstrate that you have commenced appropriate research for Assessment 3. Before starting this assessment, please read the assessment rubric at the end of this document. Assessment Task You are required to review a sample of the literature on an Australian sector. Step 1. Select a sector to study. Select one of the following sectors to study: construction sector; health sector, or retail sector. You will use this sector for both Assessment 2 and 3. Step 2. Select five relevant articles. You will identify five relevant peer-reviewed academic articles. These articles must be: (1) Published since 2014 (2) Related to your selected sector: construction, healthy or retail, in Australia, and in a way that is useable for Assignment 3 Essay (3) Related to one of the unit themes from Weeks 1 – 5 in this unit (e.g. HRM, industrial relations, HR planning and work design challenges) It is recommended that you undertake your research via the online ‘search’ of CQUniversity Library. Step 3. Write 500 words on each article (500 x 5= 2500 words) For each journal article, write to the headings in the template. These include: • full reference • outline of research objective and research question • outline of the method • discussion of the findings • summary of the conclusions • indication of how this will be relevant for your Essay 3. Place each article on a new page. Present your Review of the Literature in format provided in the template. For more information, see the library guide for writing an annotated bibliography. http://libguides.library.cqu.edu.au/ld.php?content_id=37972692 References g APA referencing. For more information, see : https://www.cqu.edu.au/?a=14033 Submitting All assessments must be submitted through the Moodle site. No email submissions will be accepted. All assessments submitted electronically through Moodle must be through the Student Portal http://my.cqu.edu.au • Failure to submit electronically will be taken as a failure to submit and therefore a zero (0) score will apply to the specific assessment. No assessment coversheet is needed to be attached while submitting through Moodle Plagiarism Copy detection software (TurnitIn) is used in this course and work found in contravention of the copying and plagiarism rules will be investigated. Penalties apply in the case of proven instances of copying, plagiarism and academic dishonesty. Please check the following links to know more about TurnitIn: http://turnitin.com/en_us/training/student-training/viewing-originality-reports http://turnitin.com/en_us/training/student-training/about-originalitycheck TurnitIn is only a tool and judgement needs to be used when you view your Originality Report. TurnitIn does not make a judgement as to what is referenced properly, it highlights the non-original material in a piece of work. You should use the similarity score as aguide only and must then check the originality report to determine whether or not changes need to be made to the assessment. Required Students must familiarise themselves with the following policies and procedures at http://policy.cqu.edu.au: Assessment and examination policy and procedures – Assessment of Coursework Policy Assessment of Coursework Principles Assessment of Coursework Procedures HRMT20024 Assessment 2 Rubric – Reviewing the Literature Key Criteria Exceeds Expectations (High Distinction) 85-100% Exceeds Expectations (Distinction) 75 – 84% Meets Expectations (Credit) 65 – 74% Meets Expectations (Pass) 50 – 64% Below Expectations (Fail) below 50% Selected articles 15% Utilises 5 excellent sources that are current, from credible sources and highly relevant to Assessment 3. Utilises 5 very good sources that are current, credible, and relevant to Assessment 3. Utilises 5 sources that are current and appropriate for use in Assessment 3. Utilises 5 sources that are somewhat relevant for Assessment 3. Utilises sources that are not sufficient in quantity, quality or relevance to Assessment 3 Identification of Research aims and methods 30% The assessment presents a detailed and focused summary of the ideas presented, demonstrating a high level ability to identify HRM strategies and practices The assessment presents a fairly detailed and focused summary of the ideas presented The assessment presents a somewhat detailed and focused summary of the ideas presented The assessment provides limited detail with no clear summary of the ideas presented The assessment fails to provide any clear evidence of the ideas presented Presentation of findings and conclusions and link to essay 3 40% Excellent and logical argument about the value of each article to the contemporary HRM issues in Assessment 3 topic, and excellent identification of the issues for your selected sector Strong argument about the value of each article to the contemporary HRM issues in Assessment 3 topic and very good identification of the issues for your selected sector Some argument about the value of each article to the contemporary HRM issues Assessment 3 topic and good identification of the issues for your selected sector Weak argument and no discussion of the contemporary HRM issues in Assessment 3, and/or limited identification of the issues for your selected sector Little or no argument or little relevance to the HRM issues in Assessment 3, and little or no identification of the issues for your selected sector. Presentation and quality of writing 15% Quality of writing at a very high standard. Correct grammar, spelling and punctuation. Quality of writing is of a high standard. Few grammar, spelling and punctuation mistakes. Quality of writing is of a good standard. Few grammar, spelling and punctuation mistakes. Some problems with sentence structure and presentation Frequent grammar, punctuation and spelling mistakes. Use of inappropriate language. Quality of writing is at a very poor standard so barely understandable. Many spelling mistakes. Little or no evidence of proof reading. Late assessment penalty 5% per day x 30 marks = 1.5 marks per day
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL – NO PLAGIARISM.
- **REMEMBER TO PRECISE PAGE NUMBER**
- Hit The Order Button To Order A **Custom Paper**