55395 – Assessment InformationSubject Code: BUS 604Subject Name:

SOLUTION AT Australian Expert Writers

Assignment Details:
Assessment InformationSubject Code: BUS 604Subject Name: Business Research MethodsAssessment Title: Assessment 2 – Group PresentationWeighting: 15 %Total Marks: Length: 15Minimum of 10 slides (+- 10%)Due Date: Submission due Week 7 – Sunday at 11.59 pmCOURSE: Master of Business (Research)Unit: Business Research MethodsUnit Code: BUS 604Type ofAssessment: Assessment 2 – Group PresentationUnit Learning Outcomes addressed: (a) Demonstrate a critical appreciation of the major steps involved in conducting research.(b) Demonstrate an extended understanding of various business research designs and methods, and be able to evaluate and explain their strengths and weaknesses in research designs for particular projects.(c) Demonstrate a critical appreciation of ethical issues in research and an advanced understanding of appropriate procedures and protocols applicable to these issues.(d) Critically review and evaluate research literature.(e) Design research for a particular project, explaining the limitations, advantages, and technical and ethical implications of the techniques employed.(f) Select, justify and design questions suitable for a survey instrument and be able to analyse survey data in relation to a particular research question.(g) Prepare a formal research proposal investigating an innovative and/or unresolved research question.Criteria for Assessment: • Understanding of the project• Evidence of analysis• Organisation and Use of visual aids• Non-verbal & Verbal deliveryAssessment Task: Students are to select a presentation topic from the list of topics below and make a 15-20 minute presentation.Submission Date: Week 7 – Sunday at 11.59 pm (online submission).Total Mark & Weighting: 15 marks | 15%Students are advised that any submissions past the due date without an approved extension or approved extenuating circumstances incur a 5% penalty per calendar day,calculated from the total mark e.g. a task marked out of 15 will incur a 1.75 mark penalty per calendar day.Assessment 1– Group Presentation (4 students). Presentations would be made during the tutorial time.Assessment DescriptionStudents are to select a presentation topic from the list of topics below and make a 15-20 minute presentation. Students must conduct extensive research on the topic and must cite relevant sources to support their arguments.Topic 1: Using relevant literature and examples, compare and contrast Narrative research and phenomenological researchTopic 2: Using relevant literature and examples, compare and contrast case study research and ethnographic researchPresentation requirements:• A PowerPoint presentation in class with a minimum of 10 slides• The PowerPoint presentation must go for a minimum of 15 minutes and a maximum of 20 minutes. Please allow an additional 5 minutes for questions time if requested by your lecturer.• Your PPT should be converted into PDF and uploaded on Moodle on the Sunday of the Presentation week along with your handout.• Appropriate and accurate use of the APA referencing system for in-text citation as well as a reference list• You will be marked as a team.You must use a minimum of 5 references. These must be authoritative and comprise of:• At least 1 academic reference (e.g. journal article or textbook)Criteria HD (High Distinction) 85%-100% DN (Distinction)75%-84% CR (Credit) 74%-65% P (Pass)50%-64% F (Fail)0%-49%Understanding of theproject3 marks Builds a convincing argument showing how all key points are integratedtogetherUses examples to elaborate on the key points and theoryBuilds a convincing argument showing how key issues, analysis, and recommendations areintegrated togetherIncludes all issues,analysis andrecommendations but withlittle elaborationNot integrated with theory or are not justifiedIncludes some issues butanalysis glossed overTeam seemed uncomfortable to go beyond key facts.Key points left outNo grasp of issues that faced the client. Over-reliance on notesEvidence of analysis5 marks Able to use references to back up claims and recommendations madeRecommendations clearly come from the analysis of the project.Evidence of extensive research and analysis: journals, prescribed text, other books, verified websites, primary researchUsed references to justify analysisBackground research and analysis of this is clearlyidentifiableSteps used are shown and some rationale for the development of recommendationsprovidedSteps used in the analysis shown but little justification why or how these are used to developrecommendationsNo references to any sourcesSuggestions/recommendations just seem to appear.Organisation and Use ofvisual aids5 marks Ideas are clearly organised so audience can follow easily. The purpose of the presentation is clear in all stages and there is a seamless transition between speakers.Graphics and text are well integrated into the presentation. The text is appropriate for the content and room size.Visual presentation complements rather thandominates presentationMain ideas are presented in a logical manner. Flow of presentation is smooth between speakers.Shows that the group hasworked collaborativelyText clearly summarises the key points. Graphics and text do not distract attention from the speaker or content. Use of visual aids is consistent across the entire presentation.Main ideas are presented in a logical manner. Flow of presentation may be awkward. Group members demonstrate that they have worked on the presentation as a whole. All group members take an equal share in presentation.Group uses graphics but often differs from a verbal presentation. Not summarised so presenters end up reading off-board.Differing styles with differing speakers.Ideas are not focused. Audience may have difficulty following argument. Main points are difficult to identify. There is no transition between key points. There is an awkward transition between speakers.Presentation appears to be done by individuals rather than group.Group uses graphics but is not supported by text or presentation. Text is too dense – too much info on a slide.Differing styles withdiffering speakers No structure to the presentationAudience cannot follow sequenceNo introduction or conclusionApparent that group is notworking well togetherGroup members missing(without valid reason) or notcontributingPresents content with noPowerPoint or overhead slidesNon-verbaldelivery2 marks & Verbal Constantly looks ataudienceShows enthusiasm for their work and how this will helpthe clientAll group members use a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audiencemembers can hearActs in a very professionalmannerGenerally, presenter looks at audience duringpresentationShows expression consistent withpresentationUses gestures to point out or highlight presentationmaterialsAll voices are clearOccasionally looks at audience duringpresentationVoice is generally clearGenerally, speaks directly to the audienceSome reading off the boardSome group members difficult to understandbecause of rushed speechOnly focuses attention on one particular part of the audience, does not scanthe audienceVoice is lowConstantly talks to theboard, not the audienceSome use of filler wordsAudience members havedifficulty hearingDoes not attempt to look at the audience at all, reads notes the entire timeDistracting gestures (fidgeting) while presenting or waiting to presentExcessive use of filler words(e.g. um, er, ah, like)Use of offensive languageUse of slangTotal marks

Order from Australian Expert Writers
Best Australian Academic Writers


Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts

(USA, AUS, UK & CA Ph. D. Writers)


Order from Australian Expert Writers
Best Australian Academic Writers