56932 – Assessment InformationSubject Code: BUS 604Subject Name:

SOLUTION AT Australian Expert Writers

Assignment Details:
Assessment InformationSubject Code: BUS 604Subject Name: Business Research MethodsAssessment Title: Assessment 3 – Report on Research design and StrategyWeighting: 35 %Total Marks: Length: 352500 (+- 10%)Due Date: Submission due Week 12 – Sunday at 11.59 pmCOURSE: Master of Business (Research)Unit: Business Research MethodsUnit Code: BUS 604Type ofAssessment: Assessment 3 – Research design and StrategyUnit Learning Outcomes addressed: (a) Demonstrate a critical appreciation of the major steps involved in conducting research.(b) Demonstrate an extended understanding of various business research designs and methods, and be ableto evaluate and explain their strengths and weaknesses in research designs for particular projects.(c) Demonstrate a critical appreciation of ethical issues in research and an advanced understanding of appropriate procedures and protocols applicable to these issues.(d) Critically review and evaluate research literature.(e) Design research for a particular project, explaining the limitations, advantages, and technical and ethical implications of the techniques employed.(f) Select, justify and design questions suitable for a survey instrument and be able to analyse survey data in relation to a particular research question.(g) Prepare a formal research proposal investigating an innovative and/or unresolved research question.Criteria for Assessment: • Knowledge and Understanding• Content and exploration of theories and ideas• Analysis, synthesis and critical engagement• Technical skills and referencingAssessment Task: Based on your chosen research topic, research problem and questions, develop a research design and strategy that you will use to address the research questions. You must use relevant scholarly literature to develop your arguments.You may follow the outline below;IntroductionProvide a summary of your research problem and state your research objectives and questionsResearch designIdentify and describe a research design (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods research) appropriate for your study. Provide justifications for your decisionsResearch strategyBased on your chosen research design, select a research strategy that you will use to address your research questions. Provide justifications for your decisionsSubmission Date: Week 12Total Mark & Weighting: 35 marks | 35%Students are advised that any submissions past the due date without an approved extension or approved extenuating circumstances incur a 5% penalty per calendar day,calculated from the total mark e.g. a task marked out of 15 will incur a 1.75 mark penalty per calendar day.Marking rubricsCriteria HD (High Distinction) 85%-100% DN (Distinction)75%-84% CR (Credit) 74%-65% P (Pass)50%-64% F (Fail)0%-49%Knowledge and understanding5 marks Command of the topic, unusual creativity, perception and insight, all suggesting that work should be published in an academic forum. Demonstrates command of the topic by showing creativity, perception and insight — a serious contribution to the academic debate. Demonstrates a well- informed understanding of the topic by showingcreativity and insight — a serious contribution to the academic debate. Understanding of contemporary academic debate, with somecreative input and insight, with a tendency toward description. Limited/poor understanding demonstrated. Any creative input is somewhat off the point.Content and exploration of theories and ideas 10 marks Outstanding selection that makes a substantial contribution to academic debate. Outstanding selection from a wide relevant and innovative range of perspectives and sources. Selection from a wide and relevant range of perspectives and sources that draws upon contemporary academic debate. Relevant selection from a range of perspectives and sources. Sources are mostly integrated into the overall argument. Narrow selection, minimal use of sources, to support the argument.Analysis, synthesis and critical engagement15 marks Outstanding use of source material.Excellent argument that is of the highest academic quality. Sources very well integrated into the overall argument. Clear well structured argument that is well crafted and Sources wellintegrated into the overall argument. Clear, cogent and wellstructured Mostly clear, cogent and wellstructured argument. Demonstrates criticality and Sources are not properly integrated into the argument. Absence of clear and cogent argument.Incomplete analysisCritical distance and outstanding analysis of the question, to a high degree of excellence. cogent. Critical distance and outstanding analysis of the question. argument.Criticaldistance and sound analysis of the question. generally good analysis. with a tendency to accept the source material at face value.Technical skills and referencing5marks Referencing impeccable using appropriate conventions.No errors in grammar or spelling. Referencing clear and accurate using appropriate conventions.Virtually no errors in grammar or spelling. Referencing clear and accurate using appropriate conventions. Good grammar and spelling. Referencing sufficiently clear and using an appropriate convention. Adequate grammar and spelling. References limited/inappropriate. Many errors in grammar andspelling, making it difficult or impossible to read.

Order from Australian Expert Writers
Best Australian Academic Writers

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts

(USA, AUS, UK & CA Ph. D. Writers)

CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS

Order from Australian Expert Writers
Best Australian Academic Writers

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

YOU MAY ALSO READ ...  (Q) In Exercises 11–14, find the value(s) of h for which thevectors are linearly dependent. Justify each