59188 – Assessment Details and Submission GuidelinesTrimester

SOLUTION AT Australian Expert Writers

Assignment Details:
Details and Submission T2 2020Unit Code HC1062Unit Title Decision Making and problem solvingAssessment Type Group Assignment, Group size: 3 to 4 membersAssessment Title Research ReportPurpose of the (with ULOMapping) Students are required identify a management problem for a selected organization.(Excluding a market research problem) and Prepare a persuasive report showing how the management problem/decision should be managed.Weight 30 % of the total assessmentsTotal Marks 30 marks – research paperWord limit At least 2,500 wordsDue Date Week 10 – 11:59pmAssignment SpecificationsPurpose:In a group of 3 to 4 students, prepare a persuasive report showing how the management problem/decision should be managed. This assignment aims at ensuring that students have familiarised themselves with a general framework of at least one management related topic. Students will be required to apply relevant theoretical concepts with the use of practical examples in most cases in a research .Details: report – worth 30% of your final grade and must be submitted Week 10 at 11:59pm.Identify a multinational company.Identify a management problem. (Note: not a market research nature).Specify research questions which address the management problem/decision.Design a research program.Carry out the research.Sourcing from ONLY secondary data.Analyse the findings.Identify alternatives and make recommendations to improve the performance of the organisation.Your report is to be as a report. It must include;• Executive summary• Table of contents• Section headings• Paragraphing• Page numbers• Reference list at the end of the reportHC1062 Decision making and problem solvingMarking Rubric – ReportExcellent Very Good Good Satisfactory UnsatisfactoryExecutiveSummary(4 marks) Clear evidence of a summary which summaries the entire report (4 marks) Clear evidence of a summary which summarisesthe entire report (3 marks) Some evidence of a summarywhich summarisesthe entire report(2marks) Limited evidence of a summary of the entire report ( 1 mark) No executive summaryincluded (0 marks) on allocated general framework(8 marks)Demonstration of Outstanding knowledge of the chosen topic and has includedsignificant research which are beyond areas covered within the lecture notes. (8 marks) Demonstration of very good knowledge of the chosen topic and has included someresearch beyond areas covered within the lecture notes. (7 marks) Demonstration of good knowledge of the chosen topic andhas included minimalresearch beyond areas covered within the lecture notes. (6 marks) Demonstration of satisfactory knowledge of the chosen topic and has included noresearch beyond areas covered within the lecture notes. (4 marks) Demonstration of little or no knowledge ofthe chosen topic and has little or no relevance to the topic chosen ( 4 marks)Application of theory onIndividualcomponent (8 marks) Your interpretation of theory is accurate andinsightful and has included significant research which goes beyond areas covered within the lecture notes.Identification of the author has beenidentified. (8 marks) Your interpretation of theory is accurate and has some insight and included some research which goes beyond areas covered within the lecture notes.Identification of the author has beenidentified. (7 marks) Your interpretation of theory somewhat accurate and has included minimal research which is beyond areas covered within the lecturenotes. Identification of the author hasbeen identified(6mrks) interpretation of theory is very general and hasincluded noresearch whichis beyond areas covered within the lecture notes. Identification of the author hasbeen identified.(4 marks) Your interpretation of theory ismissing or not relevant to the topic. No identification of the author had been given( 4 marks)Overall presentationand ofreport (6marks)Report is exceptionallystructured with clarity, use of paragraphs and subheadings. (6mrks) Report is well structured with clarity, use of paragraphs and subheadings.(5mrks) Report is somewhat structured with clarity, use of paragraphs andsubheadings. (4mrks) Report is structured withsome clarity, and use of someparagraphs and subheadings.(3 marks) Poorly presented. Report is not structured with any clarity, and does not use of paragraphs and subheadings.( 3marks)HC1062 Decision making and problem solvingReferencing(4 marks) Clear systematic referencing using Harvard style for all sources. At least6 relevant references were used from good sources. All intext referencing done correctly and relevant. (4marks) Clear systematic referencing using Harvard style for all sources. At least5 relevant references were used from good sources. All intext referencing done correctly and relevant. (3 marks) Clear systematic referencing using Harvard style for all sources. At least 4 relevant references were used from good sources. Most intext referencing done correctly and relevant. (2 marks) Limited attempt at formatting references. References largely unrelated to the topic area. At least 3 references were provided. Most intext referencing done correctly and relevant. (1mark) Poorly presented, no apparent structure. No use of Harvard referencing style. References were unrelated to the topic area. Only 0 r 1 relevant reference given( 1 marks)

Order from Australian Expert Writers
Best Australian Academic Writers

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER