59267 – Assessment 2 InformationSubject Code: BUS101Subject Name:

SOLUTION AT Australian Expert Writers

Details:
Assessment 2 Code: BUS101Subject Name: CommunicationAssessment Title: Individual ReportAssessment Type: ReportWord Count: 1000 Words (+/-10%)Weighting: 30 %Total Marks: 30Submission: via TurnitinDue Date: Week 8Your TaskIn week 4 you will cover report writing and be given a sample of the elements required when writing reports. You will write a report following this format, using the information below as a starting point and conducting further research to support your . In weeks 5, 6 and 7, there will be a number of activities during class that will also help you support you in developing your report.Assessment DescriptionLO1: Employ the principles of communication to develop strategies to overcome barriers to communicationLO2: Relate the ways communication and affects meaning to a contextLO3: Apply professional written communication skills to a range of contextsLO4: Demonstrate the ability to effectively communicate with diverse groupsYou are working as a Graduate Communications Officer for “Apurla Community Services”, and the Operations Manager has approached you to work on a project of high importance. The organisation is struggling to work effectively because the different departments are operating independently and not communicating well with each other. The Operations Manager wants you to prepare a report to make some recommendations on how the situation can be improved. The Operations Manager would like you to provide an analysis and recommendations, outlining how improved communication flow between the departments could improve operational outcomes. Key issues identified include:• Each of these groups has a tendency to operate independently, using different communication structures resulting in a lack of cohesion and poor team synergy.• At times their tasks overlap so conflicting information and outcomes can occur this is reducing organisational effectiveness.• Some of the formal and structured communication is working well but there are also some informal structures that are spreading incorrect information.The organisation has a number of key employee groups, volunteers and external community groups that they work with. The organisations structure is outlined below:In your report you need to provide a theoretical summary of how organisational communication should flow and how synergy can be improved to maximise work team effectiveness to support your recommendations.Assessment InstructionsThe assessment is to be presented in a Report Format using headings and requires the following sections:• Cover page• Table of contents• Introduction (100 words) – state simply the of the report and the structure it will follow.• Theoretical Analysis of Communication Flow (250 words) – your own research and in your own words provide an analysis of how organisational communication should flow (this can be based on activities we do in class in week 5).• Theoretical Analysis of Communication in Work Teams (250 words) – your own research and in your own words provide an analysis of how improved communication could develop team effectiveness.• (100 words) – a summary of the key information you identified in your report.• Recommendations (300 words) – a total of 2 strategies the organisation could implement to develop a communication process that enables the different departments to have consistent internal communication (some of the activities we do in week 7 will help with this).• Reference ListImportant Study InformationPlease refer to the marking criteria as a guideline to help you complete the report.Reference guide: Use a minimum of four references. This may include weekly readings, textbooks and journal articles. Referencing should be in the Harvard style – please refer to Kaplan’s ‘Harvard Referencing Guide’.KBS presentation guidelines: Arial, size 11 font, 1.5 spacingSubmission: Word document and submit to Turnitin by the due date. Late submissions will incur a late penalty.Academic Integrity PolicyKBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy.What is academic integrity and misconduct?What are the penalties for academic misconduct?What are the late penalties?How can I appeal my grade?Click here for answers to these questions:http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/.Word Limits for Written AssessmentsSubmissions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded.Study AssistanceStudents may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information.Assessment Marking GuideCriteria HD (High Distinction) 85%-100% DN (Distinction)75%-84% CR (Credit) 74%-65% P (Pass)50%-64% NN (Fail)0%-49%ReportStructure15 Marks • A clear and succinct introduction including purpose and report structure• Clear and succinct recommendations based on analysis that demonstrates an understanding of organisational communication.• clearly, succinctly and accurately summarises the report• Graphics are appropriate, labelled and placed close to the text that refers to them. Up to 15 marks • A clear introduction including purpose and report structure• Clear recommendations based on analysis that demonstrates an understanding of organisational communication.• clearly and accurately summarises the report• Graphics are appropriate and labelled.Up to 12.5 marks • Introduction includes purpose and report structure• Recommendations are based on analysis which demonstrates some understanding of organisational communication.• summarises the report• Graphics are appropriate.Up to 11 marks • Introduction may be missing purpose or report structure• Recommendations are based on description and show limited understanding of organisational communication• does not fully reflect the contents of the report• Graphics are used to illustrate points but not fully discussed.Up to 9.5 marks • Introduction is vague and does not include purposeand report structure• Recommendations are not justified and do not show understanding oforganisational communication• does not reflect the contents of the report• Graphics do not relate to the discussion. Up to 7 marksResearchand Analysis15 Marks• Located, evaluated and synthesised relevant information from the readings and academic sources to accurately support discussions• A clear, succinct and critical analysis demonstrating critical understanding and valid judgements• Discussion is of comprehensive depth and all aspects presented arerelevant to the situationUp to 15 marks • Located, evaluated and incorporated relevant information from the readings and local sources to support discussions• clear and succinct analysis demonstrating understanding and valid judgements• Discussion is of appropriate depth and many aspects presented are relevant to thesituationUp to 12.5 marks • Located and incorporated relevant information from the readings and local sources to support discussions• Analysis demonstrating some understanding and judgement• Discussion has some depth and some aspects presentedare relevant to the situationUp to 11 marks • Located relevant information from the course readings to support discussions• A description demonstrating limited understanding and judgements• Most aspects of the discussion are relevant to the situation but not in depthUp to 9.5 marks • Used information from sources that are tenuously related or are not relevant to the discussions• A description with limited understanding• Many aspects of the discussion are not relevantto the situationUp to 7 marksPresentation10 Marks• The content has been logically and succinctly structured to create a cohesive and coherent analytical piece of work• Grammar, spelling and punctuation are flawless• Intext referencing and reference list format is accurate and consistently adheres to KBSHarvard Reference styleUp to 10 marks • The content has been logically structured to create a cohesive and coherent analytical piece of work• Grammar, spelling and punctuation are good.• Intext referencing and reference list format is almost always accurate and consistently adheresto KBS Harvard Reference styleUp to 8 marks • The content has been logically structured to create a cohesive and coherent piece of work • Few errors in grammar, spelling and punctuation• Intext referencing and reference list format is accurateto KBS Harvard Reference styleUp to 7 marks • The content has been partially structured to create a comprehensible descriptive piece of work consisting of loosely linked rudimentary paragraphs• Sentences and paragraphs are readable but with grammatical errors• Attempt made to adhere toKBS Harvard referencing in both Intext referencing and referencelist but with errors Up to 6 marks • The content has limited structure to create a piece of work consisting of rudimentary paragraphs • Many grammatical, vocabulary and spelling errors• Did not adhere to KBSHarvard referencing in both Intext referencing andreference listUp to 4 marksPage 4 Kaplan School Assessment Outline

Order from Australian Expert Writers
Best Australian Academic Writers

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER