59292 – AT2 Marking Guide & Rubric 2020Risk Assessment PlanDUE

SOLUTION AT Australian Expert Writers

AT2 Guide & 8PM MONDAY SEPTEMBER 21OverviewBrief description of assessment taskFormulate a risk assessment plan to define and characterise the potential influence of environmental factors.Detail of student outputA written document (2000 +/- 10%) plus references (at least 6 and these as well as the intext citations are not included in the word count).Grading and Weight (% total mark for unit)45%Unit Learning OutcomesULO1: Identify key national and international environmental health agencies, as well as regulatory programs, guidelines and authorities that control environmental health issues; this will be achieved by you demonstrating your understanding of core health protection principles.ULO2: Explain environmental health safety standards and related management procedures; this will be achieved by you demonstrating your knowledge or appropriate responses to risks.ULO3: Review and interpret environmental health data, including toxicology and ecology; this will be achieved by you providing actions and priorities relevant to the risks.ULO5: Critique plans and strategies that define and characterise the environmental factors that influence health; this will be achieved by you providing context to risks and the consequence steps in management of the risks.Graduate Learning OutcomesGLO1: Discipline-specific knowledge and capabilities: appropriate to the of study related to a discipline or profession; this will be achieved by you analysing and discussing material relevant to the unit content.GLO2: Communication: using oral, written and interpersonal communication to inform, motivate and effect change; this will be achieved by you effectively communicating information on health protection issues in written form.GLO3: Digital literacy: using technologies to find, use and disseminate information; this will be achieved by using a wide range of sources online to inform your risk management plan.GLO4: Critical thinking: evaluating information using critical and analytical thinking and judgment; this will be achieved by you analysing and interpreting health information relevant to health protection risks.GLO5: Problem solving: creating solutions to authentic (real world and ill-defined) problems; this will be achieved by you providing recommendations and solutions to the risks that you have researched.1 AT2 Marking Guide & Rubric 2020Details Note that point 1 is covered in Part A, while points 2-6 are covered in Part B. Part B can be Consists of two parts: completed in table form and is a 1000 wordequivalent component of the assignment.A. 1000 (+/- 10%) word report on the contextof the risk, with a choice of: You must refer to the AT2 Risk Rating Criteria pdf to determine the likelihood and1. Music festival in rural setting consequences of the risks you identify.2. Community/farmers’ market3. Local sporting event for children at You then must complete the AT2 Risk suburban park Assessment Plan Template doc and submit that4. Fund-raising event at the beach as your Part A and Part B assessment.You will need to follow this procedure for the entire assignment (this is in accordance with the Australian/New Zealand Standard on Risk Management AS/NZS ISO 31000:2018):1. establishing context – identifying the basic parameters in which risk must be managed (e.g. of the choices provided above). This will address part A.2. avoiding risk – establishing whether there is a risk and whether potential risk can be averted (e.g. by questioning whether a procedure is necessary).3. identifying risks – a systematic and comprehensive process that ensures that no potential risk is excluded from further analysis and treatment (e.g. using root cause analysis).4. analysing risks – considering the sources of risk, their consequences, the likelihood that those consequences may occur, and factors that affect consequences and likelihood (e.g. existing controls).5. evaluating risks – comparing the of risk found during the analysis process with previously established risk criteria and assessing available options for ease of implementation and impact, resulting in a prioritised list of risks for further action.6. treating risks – implementing appropriate management options for dealing with identified risk (e.g. modifying procedures, protocols or work practices; providing education; and monitoring compliance with infection prevention and control procedures). one file needs to be submitted.Please note that this assessment is in alignment with the Council of Academic PublicHealth Institutions Public Health competencies. Australasia’s (CAPHIA)Graduate foundationB. Completion of risk management plan Parts A and B are in the same template, so only2AT2 Marking Guide & Rubric 2020Assessment Criterion Exemplar Accomplished Competent Developing BeginningContext (approx. 1000 ):Points to consider:Defining scope of event/situationOrganisations involvedIdentification of stakeholders & objectivesDetermining levels of acceptable risk Identified topic clearly. Described context related to that topic with extensive and informed .= 16 – 20 marks Identified topic clearly.Described context related to that topic with significant informed .= 14 – 15 marks Identified topic. Described context but not clearly related to that topic with some informed .= 12 – 13 marks Partially Identified topic.Limited on context.= 10 – 11 marks Context absent or unclear.= 0 – 9 marksRisk descriptions & controls:Points to consider:SourcesDescriptionsControls Risk procedures cover all points extensively. At least 6 different risks covered.= 24 – 30 marks Risk procedures cover all points significantly. 4-5 different risks covered= 21 – 23.5 marksRisk procedures cover all points reasonably. 2-3 different riskscovered= 18 – 20.5 marksRisk procedures cover some points in limited detail.1 risk covered= 15 – 17.5 marksRisk procedures are not covered or are unclear.0-1 risk covered= 0 – 14.5 marksRisk analysis & evaluation:Points to consider:Risk RatingsAvoiding risksIdentifying risksRisk analysisEvaluating risksTreating risks Perceptive on the event/situation.= 24 – 30 marks Clear on the event/situation.= 21 – 23.5 marks Some on the event/situation.= 18 – 20.5 marks Unclear on the event/situation.= 15 – 17.5 marks absent, unclear or not related to the event/situation.= 0 – 14.5 marks3AT2 Marking Guide & Rubric 2020Assessment Criterion Exemplar Accomplished Competent Developing BeginningExpression:The plan is well written, grammatically correct, and contains no spelling or typing mistakes.Writing is of a consistently very high standard with noerrors in spelling/ punctuation/grammar.= 4 – 5 marks Writing is of a consistently high standard with minimal errors in spelling/ punctuation/grammar.= 3.5 marks Writing is mostly of a good standard with some errors in spelling/ punctuation/grammar.= 3 marks Writing needs improving. A number of errors evident with regard to spelling/punctuation/ grammar. A final edit to eliminate all errors would enhance the professionalism of this strategy proposal.= 2.5 marks Writing is of an unsatisfactory standard with frequent errors in spelling/punctuation/ grammar. This strategy proposal requires carefulediting to lift it to an acceptable academic standard.= 0 – 2 marksFormatting requirements:Black font, size 12, Arial or Calibri, margins approx. 2cm, 1.5 line spacing, pages numbered with student’s name on each page. Paragraphs used. Word count included at end of report. No formatting errors.Overall excellent standard of report presentation.= 4 – 5 marks One formatting error.= 3.5 marks Two formatting errors.= 3 marks Three formatting errors. A final edit to eliminate all errors would enhance the professionalism of this assignment.= 2.5 marks More than three formatting errors.= 0 – 2 marksReferences:The plan is well referenced.References must be within a date range of 2010-2020.HARVARD Style maintained throughout Referencing is exceptional, mainly high-quality sources (i.e. peer-reviewed journals and gov/NGO reports), all references correct and more than 6 references used.= 4 – 5 marks Referencing is of a high standard, some highquality sources (i.e. mix of peer-reviewed journals and gov/NGO reports), all references correct, and 6 references used.= 3.5 marks Referencing is mostly of a good standard, a few quality sources, and 6 references used.= 3 marks Referencing needs improving, a number of errors evident and less than 6 references used.= 2.5 marks Referencing is of an unsatisfactory standard, with frequent errors and less than 6 references used OR no references used.This plan requiresattention to detail to lift itto an acceptable academic standard.= 0 – 2 marksTOTAL /95ADJUSTED TOTAL MARK /454

Order from Australian Expert Writers
Best Australian Academic Writers