59727 – Assessment Details and Submission GuidelinesTrimester

SOLUTION AT Australian Expert Writers

Assignment :
Details and T2 2020Unit Code HI6006Unit Title Competitive StrategyAssessment Type Group Assignment – maximum 4 persons per groupNote: Groups must be formed by week 6. Once a group is formed, no changes are allowed.If you fail to form a group, your lecturer may allow you to submit individually.Assessment Title – Case and Application of Strategy ModelsPurpose of theassessment Students are required to explain in report format, with reference to a case of your choice, how any one of the following would be applied:Business Strategy, Competitive Dynamics, Corporate Strategy, Acquisitions and Structure, International Strategy.This is strictly required to be your own original work.Be sure to base your answer on the models studied in class and quote your academic sources.Weight 40%, comprising: Report (week 10)Total Marks 40 [note: the total assignment is graded out of 40]Word limit Report not more than 2500 wordsDue Date Week 10 for the final report. [Late penalties accrue at the rate of -10% per day] Guidelines • All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page.• The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 12-pt Arial font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings and page numbers.• Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list, all using Harvard referencing style.• At the end of your report please include an appendix states ‘who wrote which section’, i.e. provide the student name and number for each section of the report.Assignment 2 SpecificationsPurpose:This assignment aims at ensuring that students have familiarised themselves with at least one significant case study (from any of those in the lectures or tutorials or our recommended textbook) and are able to apply the relevant foundational strategy development models that are applicable to the case.DetailsSelect any case study and choose from the following aspects of competitive strategy to apply the theories of strategy development and implementation as relevant to the case study you choose:• Business Strategy• Competitive Dynamics• Corporate Strategy• Acquisitions and Structure• International StrategyIn this report, the use of sub-headings is essential.Be sure to use paragraphing.Be sure to reference your sources in-text and provide a list of references at the end, all in Harvard style.Your final is due of week 10 at midnight. Late submissions attract penalties at the rate of -10% per day.Assignment Structure RequiredCover page [this is essential and must be completed accurately]Executive SummaryTable of ContentsBody of the report to contain Section Headings – e.g. introduction, brief summary of the case; identification of strategic issues; relevant theoretical concepts, application of strategy model, conclusion.Sub-sections are to be numbered.Paragraphing must be used.Page Numbers must be used.Reference List at the end must be in Harvard format and mainly academic Journal Articles. Appendix: Statement of ‘who wrote which section’ (see below).To ensure that all students participate equitably in the group assignment and that students are responsible for the academic integrity of all components of the assignment. You need to complete the following table which identifies which student/students are responsible for the various sections of the assignment:Assignment Section Student Name and NumberThis table needs to be completed and submitted with the assignment as it is a compulsory component required before any grading is undertaken.Marking RubricExcellent8-7 marks Very Good6-5 marks Good4-3 marks Satisfactory2 marks Unsatisfactory1 or 0 marksReferencing (in- text)Max 3 marks n/a n/a Correct in all respects Some minor errors Largely incorrect or incompleteReference List (at end)Max 4 marks n/a Correct in most respect Correct in general Some minor errors Largely incorrect or incompleteExecutive Summary Max 4 marks n/a Clear, concise and compelling A good summary of the report A basic summary of the report MissingSummary of the CaseMax 5 marks n/a Clear, concise and compellingbut with some reservation A good summary of the case A satisfactory summary of the case Inaccurate or misconstrued contentExplanation ofRelevantStrategic issuesMax 8 marks All relevant strategic Issuesare identified and well- explained Most key strategic Issues are identified and explained Some key strategicIssues are identified and explained key strategicIssues are identified and explained, but with some reservation strategic Issuesidentified or explainedincorrectly or poorlyApplication ofRelevantTheoretical ConceptsMax 8 marks The theoretical concepts havebeen matched to the issues in thecase precisely and are well applied The theoretical concepts matchthe issues in the case and areapplied quite well A good attempt hasbeen made to match andapply relevant theoreticalconcepts tothe case A satisfactory attempt hasbeen made to match andapply relevant theoreticalconcepts to the case The attempt made to match and applyrelevant theoretical concepts to the case isunsatisfactory or negligibleFormat andProfessionalism of the ReportMax 8 marks The report is exceptionallywell-documentedworthy of HighDistinction /Virtuoso quality(8-7 marks) The report is very well-documentedandDistinctive/ stand-out quality(6-5 marks) The report is well-documented and ofcredit-worthy quality(4-3 marks) The report is satisfactory(2 marks) The report is unsatisfactory(0 or 1 marks)Total40 marks* Comments Mark Awarded

Order from Australian Expert Writers
Best Australian Academic Writers