61783 – Subject Title Facilities ManagementSubject Code MGT230Assessment

SOLUTION AT Australian Expert Writers

Assignment Details:
Subject Code Title MGT 230 – Facilities , Assessment 3 ReportLearning Outcome/s (found inthe Subject Outline) 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5Assessment type (group or individual) IndividualWeighting % 30%Word count 2,000 (+/- 10%)Due day & date Week 9 before midnightClass submission Lecture ? Tutorial ?Submission type copy ? Turnitin ?Format / Layout of Assessment (details of what to include) Report:ICMS Cover PageTable of ContentsExecutive SummaryRisk management reportReference ListAppendices??????Assessment instructionsThe report must be in the form of a risk management report on any Facilities Management or WHS Management issue.The report is to be completed individually. It should be 2000 words long identifying and assessing the risk of a topic or issue related to the Facilities Management Unit content.The scope of the report should include:1. Establish the Context – planning – the purpose, scope, who is involved etc. Explaining the relevant wider context (the big picture)2. Hazard Identification: An assessment of the problems of the issue to health, the environment or organisational stability3. Risk : Assessing the nature, consequences, likelihood of the Risk including risk matrix diagram4. Controlling the Risk: How the adverse consequences of the assessment can be managed (controlled)5. Recommendations for Monitoring, Evaluation and Review. A concluding section which provides a critical analysis of the issueThe report is to be referenced in APA Style (both in-text and in the refence list. References in the list must be in text at least once) and formatted to the ICMS published standards and formats.You are expected to demonstrate wide research in this report. Do not use internet sites that are not independent and authoritative. Do not use secondary internet sources or sites such as Wikipedia that only offer opinions not substantiated facts. Do not cite your lecture material.Page 1 of 4The report has a weighting of 30% of the subject. It is due on or before Sunday Week 9 before midnight. An electronic copy must be submitted through Turnitin on or before the due date. No printed copy is required.Readings for the assessment (instructions where they can be found e.g.MyAthens database, Moodle etc.)Students are expected to locate their own source material for this report.Grading Criteria / Rubric See detailed Grading Rubric belowPage 2 of 4Criteria HIGH DISTINCTION DISTINCTION CREDIT PASS FAILResearch of the topic20 Marks* demonstrated and astutely applied comprehensive knowledge of the topic by establishing the context and impact of the issue* demonstrated and applied comprehensive knowledge of the topic by establishing the context and impact of the issue* demonstrated and applied knowledge of the topic byestablishing some context and impact of the issue * demonstrated and partially applied knowledge of the topic by establishing minimal context and impact of the issue * wrote generally the topic rather than interpreting itDDemonstratinn and application of knowledge of the issue (Hazard identification)20 Marks • identifying the key issues and implications• explaining these in detail to reveal that you:• read widely beyond the text and lecture notes• made a judicious selection of relevant material can apply relevant theories or debates to the topic • identifying the key issues and implications• explaining these in some detail to reveal that you:• read beyond the text and lecture notes• made a mostly judicious selection of relevant material• are familiar with relevant theories or debates • identifying the key issues and implications• explaining these to reveal that you:• read beyond the text and lecture noted• selected relevant material• mentioned some relevant theories or debates • identifying some of the key issues and implications• partly explaining these to reveal that you: did some reading beyond the text and lecture notes• selected some relevant material • fail to identifying some of the key issues and implications• minimal reading beyond the text and lecture notes• did not selected relevant materialUnderstanding of Risk assessment:nature of the risk,magnitude/severity of each risk element, likelihood /frequency, potential impact and consequences30 Marks* presented material loosely related to the topic rather, and relied heavily on the text and/or lecture noteso insufficient Risk assessment:nature of the risk,magnitude/severity of each risk element, likelihood /frequency, potential impact and consequencesRisk analysis with a thorough application of an excellent range of evidence from relevant sourceso Outstanding Risk assessment:nature of the risk,magnitude/severity of each risk element, likelihood /frequency, potential impact andconsequencesRisk analysis with a very good application of a wide range of evidence from relevant sourcesVery good Risk assessment:nature of the risk,magnitude/severity of each risk element, likelihood /frequency, potential impact and consequencesRisk analysis with a good application of a good range of evidence from relevant sourceso Good Risk assessment:nature of the risk,magnitude/severity of each risk element, likelihood /frequency, potential impact andconsequencesRisk analysis with a satisfactory application of evidence from some relevant sourceso Basic Risk assessment:nature of the risk,magnitude/severity of each risk element, likelihood /frequency, potential impact andconsequencesUnderstanding of Risk management and control20 Marks demonstrated and astutely applied comprehensive knowledge of the topic by applying all levels of riskcontrol demonstrated and applied comprehensive knowledge of the topic by applying all levels of risk control demonstrated and applied knowledge of the topic by establishing some levels of risk control demonstrated and partially applied knowledge of the topic by establishing minimal levels of risk control wrote generally about the topic rather than applying all levels of risk controlCommunicate in academic writing:• structure the report• adhere to conventions of written English (word choice, grammar, punctuation and spelling)• acknowledge sources and adhere to referencing conventions as per the ICMS Style Guide• adhere to structural requirements & word limit • persuasively and effectively communicated by: • effectively communicated by: • communicated by: • communicated by: • communicated by:- logically structuring the content to create a concise and cohesive report – structuring the content to create a mostly cohesive report- expressing most ideas clearly and with some fluency – partially structuring the content into loosely-linked rudimentary paragraphs- presenting most ideas clearly – partially structuring the content- expressing your ideas clearly and fluently byskilful use of vocabulary- presenting a balanced proportion of argument, analysis and evidence – expressing your ideas clearly and mostly with fluency- mostly presenting a balanced proportion of argument, analysis and evidence- using formal academic language and dispassionate tone – used occasional informal and/or emotive language- consistently adhering to the conventions of English with few or no errors – adhering to most of the conventions of English – used some conventions of English10 Markssuch that meaning had to be inferred by the reader- acknowledging all sources throughout the essay – acknowledging most sources throughout the report – mentioning some sources- accurately adhering to most of the required referencing conventions, in both the text and the reference list – adhering to most of the required referencing conventions, in both the text and the reference list – using own style of referencing or omitting references- adhering to the word limit and presentation requirements – adhering to the word limit and most presentation requirements – adhering to some presentation requirementsComments and grade:

Order from Australian Expert Writers
Best Australian Academic Writers

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER