62756 – PROJ5002 Project Management PrinciplesAssessment 3 GuidelinesAssessment

SOLUTION AT Australian Expert Writers

Assignment Details:
PROJ5002 Project Management 3 GuidelinesAssessment type Reflective EssayWord limit / length 2,000 wordsWeighting 45%Due date 11pm Sunday Week 6BackgroundTo reflect means reviewing our inner processes of thinking and feeling. John Dewey, a key originator of thinking about reflection sees it as a special form of problem solving, which requires qualities of open-mindedness, responsibility and self-awareness. Schön emphasises the concept of ‘reflection-in-action’, where the reflective practitioner evaluates intuitive understandings intrinsic to experience as a guide to action. This ‘on-the-spot’ processing is different from retrospective contemplation, which typifies most reflection on learning.This essay will require your thinking to go the following levels and have your essay arrive at the third, the level.1. the technical or evaluative level – students typically start at the first level, mostly describing and evaluating their experiences, with little connection to theory2. the practical or sense-making level – most progress to the second level, making sense of their experiences or learning in the light of theoretical understandings3. the critical level – students tend to find the third level the most challenging, as it requires a capacity to critically examine the values, beliefs and assumptions underlying their actions.Learning outcomesThis assessment task is aligned to Learning Outcomes #5:• Synthesise and reinterpret a past or existing project PMBOK terminology and frames.Assessment taskYou are required to reflect upon a project scenario where you have applied, or failed to apply, project management theory. The reflection will require you to:• provide a description of the project scenario,• analyse the project scenario with reference to project management theory and quality academic literature, and• reflect on the project scenario to identify how you could modify project management practices to enhance or positive outcomes for the project, or in future projects.Project management theory should focus on the PMBOK Process Groups (Initiating; Planning; Executing; Monitoring and Controlling; or Closing) or the 10 Knowledge Areas (see Kloppenborg 2018, p. 11).If you have no project scenario that you can reflect upon, you may the experience of project managing the Old Farm House Project.To help you in this assessment there will be a seminar on reflective writing in Week 4.Assessment structurePlease follow one of the recommended models for reflective writing (either the Record, Analyse, Reflect model, or the 5R’s of Reflective Writing) to support the main body of your essay. More on these models will be provided during the Reflective Writing Seminar in Week 4.Section Section descriptionTitle page Name, student number, word count.Table of contents If using headings/ sub-headings.Introduction Contextualise the topic, provide an outline of key theory used and summarise the key insights/ results.Main body Use a reflective writing model to structure the main body of your essay.- Record, Analyse, Reflect- 5R’s of Reflective Writing: Reporting, Responding, Relating, Resoning, ReconstructingConclusion Summarise the key insights/ results and restate how future outcomes may be modified as a result of the reflection.References List of references cited in Harvard style.Preparing your assessment1. The academic nature of this essay requires the use of in-text citation and referencing in accordance with SCU Harvard Referencing Standards. Further information regarding SCU referencing standards are available at: http://libguides.scu.edu.au/harvard2. As there is such an emphasis on the textbook, all in-text references for the textbook (both paraphrasing and direct quotes) should include a page number or the section number.3. Word count has a tolerance of 10% over or under.4. Contents page, tables, reference list, appendices (if applicable) are not included in the word count.5. Headings are not mandatory but may be included as they assist both writer and reader to follow the line of .Submission formatUpload as one single MS Word file via the Assessment 3 Submission portal in the Assessment Tasks and Submission folder Blackboard.Assessment 3 rubricScale 5 Scale 4 Scale 3 Scale 2 Scale 1Description of situation20% Description is sophisticated and insightful Description is relevant, succinct and clear Description attempted but lacks clarity or is verbose Description attempted, but lacks relevance Description inadequateIntegration with theory30% Analysis of situation is integrated with theory and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding Analysis of situation is integrated with theory and demonstrates a competent understanding Analysis of situation is explicitly connected to theory and demonstrates a developing understanding Analysis of situation is somewhat connected to theory, but the connection is loose and/ or implied No connection to theoryForward casting20% Student describes in a sophisticated manner how their future practice and/or future self will change, on their reflection and engagement with theory Student competently describes how their future practice and/or future self will change, based on their reflection and engagement with theory Student attempts to describe how their future practice and/or future self will change, based on their reflection and engagement with theory Student makes an inadequate attempt to describe how their future practice and/or future self will change; inadequate attempt to reflect and engage with theory No attempt to describe how future practice and/or future self will change in light of reflection and/or theoryReflective essay structure15% Uses a sophisticated reflective structure that connects experience with three or more theoretical components Uses a competent reflective structure that connects experience with at least three theoretical components Uses a basic reflective structure that connects experience with theory Uses some semblance of a reflective structure No reflective structure; may focus more upon description than reflection; may not use theoryReferences15% Five or more academic references present and relevant, and focus upon the Textbook, the PMBoK, and/or other academic literature, are well integrated and add weight to the analysis/ discussion Three to five academic references present and relevant, and focus upon the Textbook, the PMBoK, and/or other academic literature, and are somewhat integrated Three to five academic references present and relevant, and focus upon the Textbook, the PMBoK, and/or other academic literature though lack integration Academic references are limited to the textbook and/ or PMBoK. Academic references absent or are not relevant (possible sham referencing)

Order from Australian Expert Writers
Best Australian Academic Writers

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER