62781 – Assignment 2 Specifications• The assignment must be in

SOLUTION AT Australian Expert Writers

2 • The assignment must be in MS Word format, single spacing, 12-pt Arial font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings, paragraphing, and page numbers.• Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list, all using Harvard referencing style.Word limit: At least 2500 wordsPurpose:Assignment 2 – the Literature Review – is designed to ensure that student masters the skills of searching, locating, reading, summarising, and using relevant academic literature and secondary data to create a compelling and/or argument, thereby creating the context for their further in pursuit of the answer to their research question(s).Assignment Structure should be the following:1. An opening statement of the Research and research Question(s) – these should now be more detailed than what you had in your Topic Approval.2. Discussion of major theories, models or streams of influence around this topic. This provides your lecturer with evidence that you have gone deeper than your initial search now to find literature that leads you toward answering your research question3. Draw the reader’s attention to any contrasting views expressed in prior research in this area and give your view of how differing opinions can be brought together to help answer the research question and ultimately resolve the research problem. [the more comprehensive your literature review, the better. Whatever you do NOT find out in this literature review will leave you with more work to do when you move to the next part of the project, i.e. methodology]4. Report how it has brought you closer to an answer to your research question(s).5. Ensure all in text citations are correctly referenced.6. Add a comprehensive List of References, in Harvard referencing style. [Students please be warned that errors in referencing attract suspicion of plagiarism/academic misconduct and may require detailed investigation, prompting a request for further information from you regarding your sources.Assignment 2 – Literature Review – Marking RubricIdentification of appropriate Body of Knowledge [Max 5 marks]Depth of literature search[Max 5 marks] of Literature Sourced[Max 5 marks]Structure of theLiterature Review[max 5 marks], content and flow of discussions or arguments[Max 4 marks]Referencing (in-text and reference list)[Max 4 marks]Appendix (whoExcellent4-5 marksCited sources are all current and relevantThe sources provide an excellent depth of contextual understandingAt least 12additional sources of excellent qualityThe literature review is extremelywell-structured, with sub-sections and logical paragraphingThe literaturereview isexceptionally well-designed, with interesting and well-formulated discussion or argument that makes for compelling readingExcellent in allrespects, both in-text and the reference listVery Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory3-4 marks 2-3 marks 1-2 marks 0-1 markCited sources Cited sources Cited sources Irrelevant or poorly-are mostly are somewhat are marginally selected sourcescurrent and current and current andrelevant relevant relevantThe sources The sources The sources Insufficient depthprovide a very provide a good provide agood depth of depth of satisfactorycontextual contextual depth ofunderstanding understanding contextualunderstandingAt least 12 At least 10 At least 8 Low qualityadditional additional additional literature, lack ofsources of very sources of high sources of academic sources,high quality quality satisfactory or less than 8quality relevant sourcesThe literature The literature The literature No or little logicalreview is very review is well- review is structurewell-structured, structured, sufficientlywith sub- with sub- structured, withsections and sections and sub-sectionslogical logical and logicalparagraphing paragraphing paragraphingThe literature The literature The literature Difficult to makereview is very review is well- review is sense of what iswell-designed, designed, with sufficiently well- written; significantwith interesting interesting designed, with grammatical orand well- discussion or discussion or spelling mistakes.formulated argument that argument at Not of a sufficientlydiscussion or makes for good least worthy of high standard for anargument that reading reading MBA Capstonemakes for very Project.good readingVery good in all Good in-text Satisfactory in Unsatisfactoryrespects, both and the both in-text and referencingin-text and the reference list the referencereference list listwrote what)[Max 2 marks]Appended Not appendedTotal (30)/30

Order from Australian Expert Writers
Best Australian Academic Writers