62937 – HOLMES INSTITUTEFACULTY OFHIGHER EDUCATION Assessment

SOLUTION AT Australian Expert Writers

Assignment Details:
HOLMES INSTITUTEFACULTY OFHIGHER EDUCATIONAssessment Details and Submission GuidelinesTrimester T3 2020Unit Code HI5017Unit Title Managerial AccountingAssessment Type AssignmentAssessment Title Individual AssignmentPurpose of the assessment (with ULOMapping) Students are required to develop their of the purpose and use of management accounting (MAS) and its usefulness in aiding managers make informed decisions. You are to critically evaluate the literature (using journal articles) to analyse the practical use of MAS by contemporary companies, in terms of their relevance to the real-life companies’ decision-making by managers and achievement of business goals (ULO 1, 3 & 4)Weight 30% of the total assessmentsTotal Marks 30Word limit Not more than 3,000 words. use “word count” and include in assignment.Due Date Week 9 Wednesday, 27 January 2020 at 11.59 p.m.Submission Guidelines • All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page.• The assignment must be in MS Word format, no spacing, 12-pt Arial font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings and page numbers.• Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using Harvard referencing style.• It is the responsibility of the who is submitting the work, to ensure that the work is in fact her/his own work. Incorporating another’s work or ideas into one’s own work without appropriate acknowledgement is an offence. Students should submit all for plagiarism checking on Blackboard before final submission in the . For further details, please refer to the Unit Outline and Student Handbook.HI5017 MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT T3 2020Individual Assignment SpecificationsPurpose:This assignment aims at developing your understanding of the purpose and use of Management Accounting Systems (MAS) and its usefulness in aiding managers make informed decisions. You are to critically evaluate the literature (using journal articles) to analyse the practical use of MAS by contemporary companies, in terms of their relevance to the real-life companies’ decision-making by managers and achievement of business goals.Assignment Task: You are required to conduct a literature search and critically review a specific MAS in this assignment.Part AChoose ONE of the MAS studied in this unit from the list below, and the questions that follow:• Budgeting SystemOR• Standard Costing SystemQuestions:1. discuss the features of your chosen MAS. (3 marks)2. Discuss the potential benefits of your chosen MAS. (3 marks)3. List 4 specific examples of the type of information your chosen MAS can provide to assist managers make decisions. (2 marks)4. Identify 1 specific Australian organisation that your chosen MAS is suited for and explain why. (3 marks)Part BChoose one peer reviewed journal article (from any country) on the: Use of your chosen MAS in a real-life organisation (i.e. a case-based empirical study). The article should be published between 2000 – 2020. Choose your article only after you have accessed and reviewed several relevant articles, and then choose the best article that will answer the questions below.Questions:1. Based on your chosen journal article, briefly summarise how the MAS was designed and implemented in the real-life organisation. (4 marks)2. Based on your chosen journal article, did the MAS in the study satisfy the features discussed in Part A (Q1 and Q2)? Why or why not? Include examples in your answer from your journal article. (4 marks)3. Based on your chosen journal article, how useful was the accounting information to the internal users in the organisation? Discuss with examples from your journal article. (4 marks)4. Based on your literature findings, state two key lessons that would inform contemporary organisations about the practical use of your chosen MAS. (4 marks)Additional Information:a) You are encouraged to choose the journal article from the following Accounting and ManagementAccounting Journals:Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal;Journal of Management Accounting ResearchJournal of Applied Management Accounting Researchb) You can access these journals in ProQuest Database by clicking on the above links. Log in details for ProQuest are – Username: Holmes2004; Password: Holmes. These journals can also be accessed via the ProQuest Database link available via the Student Login page in the Holmes website. You can also use Google Scholar. Don’t use Google.c) Your chosen journal article in Part B must be uploaded (as a separate PDF file) together with your assignment (as a MS WORD file format) in Blackboard under the folder Individual Assignment . 5 marks will be deducted if you do not submit the journal article with your assignment.Assignment Structure:The report should include the following components:a. Assignment cover page clearly stating your name and student numberb. Abstract (one paragraph)c. Table of contentsd. A brief introduction or overview of what the report is about.e. Body of the assignment with appropriate section headingsf. Conclusiong. List of References.Academic IntegrityHolmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding Academic Integrity, as Academic Integrity is integral to maintaining academic quality and the reputation of Holmes’ graduates. Accordingly, all assessment tasks need to comply with academic integrity guidelines. Table 1 identifies the six categories of Academic Integrity breaches. If you have any questions about Academic Integrity issues related to your assessment tasks, please consult your lecturer or tutor for relevant referencing guidelines and support resources. Many of these resources can also be found through the Study Sills link on Blackboard.Academic Integrity breaches are a serious offence punishable by penalties that may range from deduction of marks, failure of the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of course enrolment, or cancellation of course enrolment.Table 1: Six categories of Academic Integrity breachesPlagiarism Reproducing the work of someone else without attribution. When a student submits their own work on multiple occasions this is known as self-plagiarism.Collusion Working with one or more other individuals to complete an assignment, in a way that is not authorised.Copying Reproducing and submitting the work of another student, with or without their knowledge. If a student fails to take reasonable precautions to prevent their own original work from being copied, this may also be considered an offence.Impersonation Falsely presenting oneself, or engaging someone else to present as oneself, in an in-person examination.Contract cheating Contracting a third party to complete an assessment task, generally in exchange for money or other manner of payment.Data fabrication and falsification Manipulating or inventing data with the intent of supporting false conclusions, including manipulating images.Source: INQAAHE, 2020Marking CriteriaMarking Criteria WeightingPart A1. Briefly discuss the features of your chosen MAS. 3%2. Discuss the potential benefits of your chosen MAS. 3%3. List 4 specific examples of the type of information your chosen MAS can provide to assist managers make decisions. 2%4. Identify 1 specific Australian organisation that your chosen MAS is suited for and explain why. 3%Part B1. Based on your chosen journal article, briefly summarise how the MAS was designed and implemented in the real-life organisation. 4%2. Based on your chosen journal article, did the MAS in the study satisfy the features discussed in Part A (Q1 and Q2)? Why or why not? Include examples in your answer from your journal article. 4%3. Based on your chosen journal article, how useful was the accounting information to the internal users in the organisation? Discuss with examples from your journal article. 4%4. Based on your literature findings, state two key lessons that would inform contemporary organisations about the practical use of your chosen MAS. 4%Overall Presentation of Assignment 3%TOTAL Weight 30%Marking RubricExcellent Very Good Good Satisfactory UnsatisfactoryPart ABriefly discuss the features of your chosenMAS. (3 marks) (2.1 – 3 marks) Present an excellent discussion of the features of your chosen MAS. (1.9 – 2 marks) Present a very good discussion of the features of your chosen MAS. (1.6 – 1.8 marks) Present a good discussion of the features of your chosen MAS. (1.1 – 1.5marks) Present a reasonable discussion of the features of your chosen MAS. (0 – 1 marks) Unable to explain the features of your chosen MAS.Discuss the potential benefits of your chosenMAS. (3 marks) (2.1 – 3 marks) Present an excellent discussion of the potential benefits of your chosen MAS. (1.9 – 2 marks) Present a very good discussion of the potential benefits of your chosen MAS. (1.6 – 1.8 marks) Present a good discussion of the potential benefits of your chosen MAS. (1.1 – 1.5marks) Present a reasonable discussion of the potential benefits of your chosen MAS. (0 – 1 marks) Unable to explain the potential benefits of your chosen MAS.List 4 specific examples of the type of information your chosen MAS canprovide to assist managers makedecisions. (2 marks) (1.7 – 2 marks) Clear, conciseand excellent list of 4examples of thetype of information your chosen MAS canprovide to assist (1.3 – 1.6marks) A very good list of 4 examples of the type of information your chosen MAS canprovide to assist managers make decisions. (0.9 – 1.2 marks) A good list of 4 examples of the type of information your chosen MAS canprovide to assist managers make decisions. (0.5 –0.8 marks)Adequate list of 4 examples of the type of information your chosen MAS canprovide to assist managers make decisions. (0 – 0.4 marks) Unable to present a proper list of 4 examples of thetype of information your chosen MAS canprovide to assistmanagers make decisions. managers make decisions. or confusing.Identify 1 specific Australian organisation that your chosen MAS is suited for and explain why. (3 marks) (2.1 – 3 marks)1 specific Australian organisation identified that is suited to yourchosen MASwith clear, concise compelling explanation to justify it. (1.9 – 2 marks)1 specific Australian organisation identified that is suited to your chosen MAS with very good explanation to justify it. (1.6 – 1.8 marks)1 specific Australian organisation identified that is suited to your chosen MAS with good explanation to justify it. (1.1 – 1.5marks)1 specific Australian organisation identified that is suited to your chosen MAS with adequate explanation to justify it. (0 – 1 marks) Unable to identify 1 specific Australian organisationthat is suited to your chosen MAS and to justify it.Part BBased on your chosen journal article, brieflysummarise how the MAS was designed and implemented in the reallife organisation. (4 marks) (3.6 – 4 marks) Present an excellent discussion of how the MAS was designed and implemented in your real-life organisation based on your journal article.(2.9 – 3.5marks) Present a very good discussion of how the MAS was designed and implemented in your real-life organisation based on your journal article. (2.1 – 2.8 marks) Present a good discussion of how the MAS was designed and implemented in your real-life organisation based on your journal article. (1.6 – 2 marks) Present a reasonable discussion of how the MAS was designed and implemented in your real-life organisation based on your journal article. (0 – 1.5 marks) Unable to explain how the MAS was designed and implemented in your real-life organisation based on your journal article, or confusing.Based on your chosen journal article, did the MAS in the study satisfy the features discussed in Part A (Q1 and Q2)? Why or why not? Include examples in your answer from your journal article.(4 marks)(3.6 – 4 marks) Clear, concise, compelling discussion on whether the MAS in the study satisfy the features discussed in Part A (Q1 and Q2) with examples provided from your journal article. (2.9 – 3.5marks) Present a very good discussion on whether the costing system in the study satisfy the features discussed in Part A (Q1 and Q2) with examples provided from your journal article. (2.1 – 2.8 marks) Present a good discussion on whether the costing system in the study satisfy the features discussed in Part A (Q1 and Q2) with examples provided from your journal article. (1.6 – 2 marks) Present a reasonable discussion on whether the costing system in the study satisfy the features discussed in Part A (Q1 and Q2) with examples provided from your journal article. (0 – 1.5 marks) Unable to explain whether the costing system in the study satisfy the features discussed in Part A (Q1 and Q2) with lack of examples provided from your journal article, orconfusing,Based on your chosen journal article, how useful was the accounting information to the internal users in the organisation? Discuss with examples from your journal article. (4 marks) (3.6 – 4 marks) Present an excellent discussion of how useful the accounting information was to the internal (2.9 – 3.5marks) Present a very good discussion of how useful the accounting information was to the internal users in the (2.1 – 2.8 marks) Present a good discussion of how useful the accounting information was to the internal users in the (1.6 – 2 marks) Present a reasonable discussion of how useful the accounting information was to the internal (0 – 1.5 marks) Unable to explain how useful the accounting information was to the internal users in theusers in the organisation with examples from your journal article. organisation with examples from your journal article. organisation with examples from your journal article. users in the organisation with examples from your journal article. organisation with examples from your journal article, or confusing.Based on your literature findings, state two key lessons that would inform contemporary organisations about the practical use of your chosen MAS. (4 marks) (3.6 – 4 marks) Clear, concise, compelling two key lessons that would inform contemporary organisations about the practical use of your chosen MAS. (2.9 – 3.5marks) A very good two key lessons that would inform contemporary organisations about the practical use of your chosen MAS. (2.1 – 2.8 marks) A good two key lessons that would inform contemporary organisations about the practical use of your chosen MAS. (1.6 – 2 marks) An adequate two key lessons that would inform contemporary organisations about the practical use of your chosen MAS. (0 – 1.5 marks) Unable to present two key lessons that would inform contemporary organisations about the practical use of your chosen MAS, or confusing.Overall Presentation (3 marks) (2.1 – 3 marks) Include all elements and is very well presented. Writing flows clearly and sections are linked very effectively. Referencing is exemplary.English is used very effectively and error-free. (1.9 – 2 marks) Include all elements and is well presented. Writing flows clearly and sections are linked effectively. Referencing is of a high standard. English is used effectively with very few errors present. (1.6 – 1.8 marks) Include all elements and is generally presented appropriately. Writing mostly flows well and sections are linked.Referencing is in accordance with guidelines. English is used effectively with few errors present. (1.1 – 1.5marks) Include most elements and is adequately presented. Writing sometimes does not flow clearly leaving the paper to seem disjointed in areas.Referencing is somewhat in accordance with guidelines. Basic English is used with some errors present. (0 – 1 marks) Lack key elements and is poorly presented. Writing does not flow clearly leaving the paper to seem disjointed. Referencing is not in accordance with relevant guidelines. Basic English is used with errors present.Total Marks (30) /30

Order from Australian Expert Writers
Best Australian Academic Writers

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER