65852 – 2.1 Justify and demonstrate appropriate leadership styles

SOLUTION AT Australian Expert Writers

Assignment Details:
2.1 Justify and demonstrate appropriate leadership styles and skills necessary to effectively manage, evaluate and innovate healthcare services utilising contemporary local, national and international perspectivesAccountability3.1 Create and lead social and ethical accountability to ensure efficient use of resources and equity of access to optimal and safe health care3.2 Validate the importance of integrating stakeholder partnerships in all healthcare decision-making activitiesCommunication4.1 Value and choose highly effective and sensitive communication with diverse populations to ensure positive and sustainable change in healthcare practice, policy and research4.2 Determine and recommend modes of communication necessary to optimise outcomes across differing audiences, purposes and contexts within healthcare practiceIndigenous awareness5.3 Recognise the diversity of Indigenous Australians and integrate this knowledge into practice [Synth]Weighting: 30%Due date: Monday 7 June 2020, 23:59 AEST (midnight)Length: Maximum of 1500 wordsTask: Develop a strategic plan for the next five yearsReferences: APA 7th, no minimum numberFormatting requirements: 11pt, san-serif font (e.g. Calibri or Arial), double-spaced, 30mm margins, A4 pagesScenarioWelcome to the world of the strategist.You have been appointed the Director of Organisational Development for your organisation. The first thing you must do is develop a strategic plan for the next five years.Assessment taskIn this first phase of the development of your strategic plan:• discuss the approaches you will use to develop your strategic plan• outline the key variables that are driving your organisation’s development, including any challenges that it is facing• clearly articulate a vision and mission statement and outline your goals and objectives for the next five years.When you have completed your plan submit via Canvas. For more information on submission of assessments go to Canvas tutorials: Submitting your assessments.Rubric96336 Organisational Management in Health Care | Assessment 2 Rubric96336 Organisational Management in Health Care | Assessment 2 RubricCriteria Ratings PtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApproaches to the strategic planning processDescribes and justifies the approaches chosen for the strategic planning process 30 to 25.5 ptsHD (High distinction)Succinct and clear description of rationale for choice of approaches for the strategic planning process. Justifies choice of approach based on scholarly, government and institutional literature and resources. 25.5 to 22.5 ptsD (Distinction)Clear description of rationale for approaches chosen for the strategic planning process. Correct use of evidence-based literature for justification. 22.5 to 19.5 ptsC (Credit)Description of the rationale for approaches chosen for the strategic planning process. The use of evidence-based literature is adequate to justify the selection of approaches however, further reading would enhance this section 19.5 to 15.0 ptsP (Pass)Basic explanation of description rationale for approaches chosen for the strategic planning process. There is a superficial attempt to justify use of approaches based on evidence from the literature. 15 to 0 ptsX (Fail)No/unclear explanation of rationale for approaches chosen for the strategic planning process healthcare system is measured. And/or no or irrelevant use of evidence-based literature to justify the selection of approaches.30 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentifies key variablesIdentifies and justifies a comprehensive list of key variables driving organisational development 20 to 17.0 ptsHD (High distinction)A succinct and clear description of the rationale for the choice of approaches for the strategic planning process. Justifies choice of an approach based on scholarly, government and institutional literature and resources. 17 to 14.0 ptsD (Distinction)Clear description of the identification and justification of key variables driving organisational development. Correct use of evidence-based literature. 14 to 13.0 ptsC (Credit)Description of the identification and justification of key variables driving organisational development. Use of evidence-based literature is adequate to support this section however, further reading will enhance this section. 13 to 10.0 ptsP (Pass)Basic explanation of identification and justification of key variables driving organisational development. There is a superficial attempt to use evidence-based literature in this section. 10 to 0 ptsX (Fail)No/unclear explanation of identification and justification of key variables driving organisational development. And/or no or irrelevant use of evidence-based literature to support this section.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterpretation and linkage of relevant and current literatureValidates perspectives through correct interpretation and explicit linkage of relevant and current literature to the assessment focus 10 to 8.5 ptsHD (High distinction)Explicit links between the strategic planning process and a review of the literature. 8.5 to 7.0 ptsD (Distinction)Link between the strategic planning process the literature is described. 7 to 6.5 ptsC (Credit)Link between the strategic planning process and literature is apparent. 6.5 to 5.0 ptsP (Pass)Link between the strategic planning process and the literature is somewhat apparent. 5 to 0 ptsX (Fail)Limited or no description of the strategic planning process.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticulate vision and mission statementsClearly articulate vision and mission statements that are appropriate to the organisation 10 to 8.5 ptsHD (High distinction)Vision and mission statements are clearly described. Vision and mission statements are appropriate to the organisation and the strategic plan. appropriate and explicit. 8.5 to 7.0 ptsD (Distinction)Vision and mission statements are clearly described and relevance to the organisation is clear. 7 to 6.5 ptsC (Credit)Vision and mission statements are described and relevance to the organisation is apparent. 6.5 to 5.0 ptsP (Pass)Vision and mission statements are described and relevance to the organisation is somewhat apparent. 5 to 0 ptsX (Fail)Vision and mission statements are not described or relevance to the organisation is not apparent.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation of strategic goals and objectivesIdentify and present strategic goals and objectives relevant to their organisation 20 to 17.0 ptsHD (High distinction)Strategic goals are clearly described. Goals are appropriate to the organisation and the strategic plan. Relevance to the organisation is explicit. 17 to 14.0 ptsD (Distinction)Strategic goals are clearly described and relevance to the organisation is clear. 14 to 13.0 ptsC (Credit)Strategic goals are described and relevance to the organisation is apparent. 13 to 10.0 ptsP (Pass)Strategic goals are described and relevance to the organisation is somewhat apparent. 10 to 0 ptsX (Fail)Strategic goals are not described or relevance to the organisation is not apparent.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, styling and referencingProduces correct grammar, spelling, formatting, style and referencing. 10 to 8.5 ptsHD (High distinction)Fluent writing style with consistent report-style formatting, use of headings and sub-headings, and accurate referencing. 8.5 to 7.0 ptsD (Distinction)Clear language with consistent formatting, use of headings and sub-headings, and accurate referencing. 7 to 6.5 ptsC (Credit)Generally clear language with mainly consistent formatting and few errors in referencing. 6.5 to 5.0 ptsP (Pass)Writing is less clear, with deficits in spelling, grammar, punctuation or referencing. Inconsistent formatting. 5 to 0 ptsX (Fail)Writing is unclear, with numerous deficits in spelling, grammar, punctuation, formatting, or referencing.10 ptsTotal Points: 100PreviousNext

Order from Australian Expert Writers
Best Australian Academic Writers

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts

(USA, AUS, UK & CA Ph. D. Writers)

CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS

Order from Australian Expert Writers
Best Australian Academic Writers

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

YOU MAY ALSO READ ...  Capital budget methods