65901 – AssessmentsAssessment InformationAssessment Title: Assessment

SOLUTION AT Australian Expert Writers

Assignment Details:
AssessmentsAssessment InformationAssessment Title: Assessment 3 – PresentationWeighting: 25%Length: Maximum of 15 slides (+- 10%) and 1000 words review report (+- 10%)(excluding references)Due Date: Week 12 Sunday at 11.59pmCOURSE: Master of Business (Research)Unit: Foundational Skills for Academic ResearchUnit Code: BUS600Type of Assessment: Assessment 3 – PresentationUnit Learning Outcomes addressed: a) Analyse and reflect critically on a range of materials and sources presented in written, spoken, visual and numerical format.b) Describe and discuss the key features, constituent process and constraints of academic research.c) Communicate ideas and concepts in language and structure appropriate to an academic research context.d) Articulate and express ideas and information in academic format as specified by the Excelsia College minimum academic standards, including appropriate use of the APA referencing style.e) Understand the personal, intellectual and practical requirements for successful research at a postgraduate level.Criteria for Assessment: • Understanding of the journal article• Evidence of analysis• Organisation and Use of visual aids• Non-verbal & Verbal deliveryAssessment Task: Each student is required to select one empirical, peer-reviewed journal article and prepare power point slides to be submitted online in week 12. This should be a different paper from the one used for assessment one and two. You are required to record your voice whiles presenting and submit via the lecturer’s email address. Maximum 15 slides. Your PPT slides should be centered on the following:1. Problem of the study (The reason behind the study)2. Theoretical basis (Theories used by the author(s))3. Logical reasoning4. Methodology used in the paper (Quantitative, qualitative or mixed and the analytical tools used)5. Findings of the study6. Limitations and future research direction7. Opinion about the study (Focus on a. whether the study achieved its intended objectives. b. relevance of the theory used. c.appropriateness of the methodology)Submission Date: Week 12Total Mark & Weighting: 25 marks | 25%Marking criteriacriteria High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass FailUnderstanding of theproject5 marks Builds convincing argument showing how all key points are integratedtogetherUses examples to elaborate the keypoints and theory5-4 marks Builds convincing argument showing how key issues, analysis andrecommendationsare integrated together3- 2.9 marks Includes all issues, analysis andrecommendationsbut with littleelaborationNot integrated withtheory or are notjustified2.8-2.1 marks Includes some issues but analysis glossed overTeam seemed uncomfortable to go beyond key facts.2-1.9 marks Key points left outNo grasp of issues that faced the client. Over reliance on notes1.0-0.0 marksEvidence of analysis10 marks Able to use references to back up claims and recommendations madeRecommendations clearly come from the analysis of the project.8.5 – 10 marksEvidence of extensive research and analysis: journals, prescribed text, other books, verified websites,primary researchUsed references tojustify analysis7.5 – 8.4 marks Background research and analysis of this isclearly identifiableSteps used are shown and some rationale for the development ofrecommendationsprovided6.5 – 7.4 marks Steps used in analysis shown but little justification why or how these are used to developrecommendations5.0 – 6.4 marks No references to any sourcesSuggestions/recommendations just seem appear.0-4.9 marksOrganisation and Use ofvisual aids5 marks Ideas are clearly organised so audience can follow easily. The purpose of the presentation is clear in all stages and there isseamless Main ideas are presented in logical manner. Flow of presentation is smooth between speakers.Main ideas are presented in logical manner. Flow of presentation may be awkward. Group members demonstrate that they have worked on presentation as a Ideas are not focused. Audience may have difficulty following argument. Main points are difficult to identify. There is no transition between key points. There is awkward No structure to the presentationAudience cannot follow sequenceNo introduction or conclusionApparent that group is not working well togethertransition between speakers.Graphics and text are well integrated into the presentation. Text is appropriate for the content and room size.Visualpresentationcomplementsrather thandominatespresentation5-4 marks Shows that the group has workedcollaborativelyText clearly summarises the key points. Graphics and text do not distract attention from the speaker or content. Use of visual aids are consistent across entire presentation.3- 2.9 marks whole. All group members take equal share in presentation.Group uses graphics but often differs from verbal presentation. Not summarised so presenters end up reading off board.Differing styles with differing speakers.2.8-2.1 marks transition between speakers.Presentation appears to be done by individuals rather than group.Group uses graphics but are not supported by text or presentation. Text is too dense – too much info on slide.Differing styles withdiffering speakers2 marks-1.9Group members missing(without valid reason) or notcontributingPresents content with noPowerPoint or overhead slides1-0.0 marksNon-verbaldelivery5 marks & Verbal Constantly looks ataudienceShows enthusiasm for their own work and how this will help the clientAll group members use a clear voice Generally, presenter looks at audience during presentationShows expression consistent withpresentationUses gestures to point out or highlight Occasionally looks at audience duringpresentationVoice is generally clearGenerally, speaksdirectly to audienceOnly focuses attention on one particular part of the audience, does notscan audienceVoice is lowDoes not attempt to look at audience at all, reads notes the entire timeDistracting gestures (fidgeting) while presenting or waiting to presentExcessive use of filler words(e.g. um, er, ah, like)and correct,precise pronunciation of terms so that all audiencemembers can hearActs in a veryprofessionalmanner5-4 marks presentationmaterialsAll voices are clear3- 2.9 marks Some reading off the boardSome group members difficult to understand becauseof rushed speech2.8-2.1 marks Constantly talks to the board not theaudienceSome use of fillerwordsAudience members have difficultyhearing2 marks-1.9Use of offensive languageUse of slang1-0.0 marks

Order from Australian Expert Writers
Best Australian Academic Writers


Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts

(USA, AUS, UK & CA Ph. D. Writers)


Order from Australian Expert Writers
Best Australian Academic Writers


YOU MAY ALSO READ ...  (Q) Write a reflection on the contexts of human behavior in action.