66752 – Assessment 3: Project Report – Part BDue date: Week 12Group/individual:

SOLUTION AT Australian Expert Writers

Assignment Details:
Assessment 3: Project Report – Part BDue date: Week 12Group/individual: GroupWord count/Time provided: 2000 wordsWeighting: 15%Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO1, ULO3, ULO4, ULO5Assessment 3 DetailThis assessment is a staged submissions assessment, and it should be conducted in two parts. The second part of assessment 2 should be conducted in continuation of Assessment 2(Part A).Project Report – Part B Details :At the end of assessment 2(Part A) students should have decided on the base scenario. In this assessment, students should continue the project development and optimise their case report by conducting a sensitive analysis, Identification stakeholders and their needs, understanding due diligence process. It is important that sustainability be considered during project development and optimisation process.For sensitivity analyses, parameters should be selected, and scenarios of sensitivity analyses should be defined accordingly. For each scenario, the economic analysis should be carried out, and results should be compared and explained.The students should also identify stakeholders, gather the information needed for stakeholders and supporters of the project by considering due diligence process.As a project manager, your recommendations on the project are critical. In your report assessing of the project, the report should address brief on the importance of sustainability and how the stakeholders of this project to be engaged.Guidelines for writing project report Part B:1) Identification and Justifications of parameters used in the sensitivity analysis.2) Conduct a sensitivity analysis with respect to interest rate and economic analysis.3) Identify Stakeholders and prepare a Stakeholder register.4) Consider due diligence process and provide stakeholders engagement plan.5) Consider project management and optimisation with focus on sustainability.6) Conclusions, findings, reasons for recommendation.Assessments 3 (Project Report – Part B) Marking Criteria and RubricThe assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 15% of the total unit mark. The marking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page.Assessment 3 (Project Report – Part B) Marking Criteria and RubricMarking Criteria Not Satisfactory (0-49% of the criterion mark) Satisfactory(50-64% of the criterion mark) Good(65-74% of the criterion mark) Very Good(75-84% of the criterion mark) Excellent(85-100% of the criterion mark)Identification and Justifications of parameters used in the sensitivity analysis (15 marks) Inadequate Identification and Justifications of parameters used in the sensitivity analysis.Basic Identification and Justifications of parameters used in the sensitivity analysis Exhibits a factual and/or conceptual skills forIdentification andJustifications of parameters used in the sensitivity analysis Exhibits accurate & detailedbreadth & depthIdentification and for Justifications of parameters used in the sensitivity analysis Displays ExcellentIdentification andJustifications of parameters used in the sensitivity analysis.Conducting a sensitivity analysis and economic analysis (15 marks) Inadequate sensitivity analysis and economicanalysisBasic sensitivity analysis andeconomic analysisExhibits a factual and/or conceptual skills in sensitivity analysis and economic analysis Exhibits accurate & detailed breadth & depth in sensitivity analysis and economic analysis Displays Excellent sensitivity analysis and economic analysis.Identification of Stakeholders, considering due diligence process and providing stakeholders engagement plan (20 marks) Inadequate Identification of Stakeholders, considering due diligence process and providing stakeholders engagement plan Basic Identification of Stakeholders, considering due diligence process and providing stakeholders engagement plan Exhibits a factual and/or conceptual skills inIdentification ofStakeholders, considering due diligence process and providing stakeholders engagement plan Exhibits accurate & detailedbreadth & depth inIdentification ofStakeholders, considering due diligence process and providing stakeholders engagement plan Displays ExcellentIdentification ofStakeholders, considering due diligence process and providing stakeholders engagement planConsidering project management and optimisation with focus onsustainability (15 marks) Inadequate Considering project management and optimisation with focus on sustainability.Basic Considering project management and optimisation with focus on sustainability Exhibits a factual and/or conceptual skills in Considering project management and optimisation with focus on sustainability Exhibits accurate & detailedbreadth & depth in Considering project management and optimisation with focus on sustainability Displays Excellent Considering projectmanagement and optimisation with focus on sustainability.Conclusions and recommendations. (5 marks) Inadequate Conclusions andrecommendationsDisplays Basic Conclusions and recommendations Exhibits a factual and/or conceptual skills of Conclusions and recommendations.Exhibits accurate and Detailed breadth and depth in Conclusions andrecommendationsDisplays Excellent Conclusions and recommendationsWriting and Presentation (20 marks)- Evidence of good academic writing; – Free of any grammatical errors; using correct sentence structure; applying an extensive range of vocabulary; – Proper introduction and conclusion. Consistent formatting with suitable headings and sub-headings – Consistent use of labels, highlights, font weight and underline, Reference listReferencing using HARVARD guidelines Inadequate Writing andPresentation skillsBasicWriting and Presentation skillsExhibits a factual and/or conceptual skills of Writingand Presentation skillsExhibits accurate and Detailed breadth and depth in Writing andPresentation skillsDisplays Excellent Writing and Presentation skills

Order from Australian Expert Writers
Best Australian Academic Writers

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts

(USA, AUS, UK & CA Ph. D. Writers)

CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS

Order from Australian Expert Writers
Best Australian Academic Writers

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

YOU MAY ALSO READ ...  Explain John Stuart Mill’s theory of higher and lower pleasures