Assessment 3: Critical review and evaluation of literature on selected topicDue date: Week 10Group/individual: IndividualWord count / Time provided: 2000 wordsWeighting: 30%Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO-1,…

SOLUTION AT Australian Expert Writers

Assignment Details:
Assessment 3: Critical review and evaluation of literature on selected topicDue date: Week 10Group/individual: IndividualWord count / Time provided: 2000 wordsWeighting: 30%Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO-1, ULO-2, ULO-3, and ULO-4Assessment Details:This assessment requires student to (a) review the most recent literature (last five years) on one of three project knowledge areas (Scope OR Schedule OR Cost) (b) critically evaluate contemporary topic of the selected knowledge area of project scope, schedule or cost management and discuss its application in a project environment along with its impact on project success and managerial decisions.Your work should include the following:See the resources by Monash University via this link https://www.monash.edu/rlo/assignmentsamples/assignment-types/stand-alone-literature-review1. Abstract2. Introduction3. The body4. Conclusion5. List of references (use Harvard Style)It is recommended to visit the SLS page for more information about this type of assessment via this link https://apic.instructure.com/courses/39/pages/literature-review?module_item_id=631Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 30% of the total unit markMarking Criteria Not satisfactory(0-49%) of the criterion mark Satisfactory(50-64%) of the criterion mark Good(65-74%) of the criterion mark Very Good(75-84%) of the criterion mark Excellent(85-100%) of the criterion markLiterature review(technical approach) (15 marks) Fails to identify enough of the literature to yiel an informative review. Incomplete and not systematic, butd adequate to identify part of the literature Evidence of reviewing possibly incomplete but using appropriate approaches , Very careful reviewing systematic combinations of searc terms Outstanding evidenceofhsystematic review using multiple searches, multiple databasesStructure (10 marks) Fail to present the work by incorporating the structure Incomplete structure and not clear components flow Good structure but more than one component are overlapping and not Very good structure but one component is not well presented or Excellent structure that includes allcomponents (abstract, introduction, body,Page | 6Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111PRV12007; CRICOS 03048DApproved: 14/02/2019, Version 1recommended (doesnot include clear structure of main components of abstract, introduction, body, conclusion and list o references) f clearly presented, ormissing two components missing one component conclusion and reference list)Critical analysis and evaluation(40 marks)No demonstration of critical evaluation through analysis of contemporary ideas/concept in the selected topic Evidence of limited interpretation and demonstration of critical evaluation through the analysis of contemporary ideas/concept in the selected topic Evidence of good demonstration of critical evaluation through the analysis of contemporary ideas/concept in in the selected topic along with good analysis of its impact on project life cycle.Evidence of very good understanding and demonstration of critical evaluation through the analysis of contemporary ideas/concept in the selected topic along with very good analysis of its impact on project success and managerial decisions and trade off with detail explanation demonstrating very good critical thinking skills.Evidence of an excellentunderstanding of and demonstration of critical evaluation through the analysis of contemporary ideas/concept in the selected topic along with very good analysis of its impact on project success and in managerial decisionwith detail explanation. Referencing of supporting literature in the interpretation, explanation and analysis is presented. Analysis presented is rigours and enlightening indicating independent strongly argued coherent writing.Clarity of Expression(20 marks)The writing is poorwith no logical flow and many grammatical errors The writing is satisfactory exhibiting majority of grammatically correct sentences that are appropriately punctuated with some spelling or typing errors but may need to interpret. The writing is fluent and coherent with good presentationexhibiting grammatically correct sentencesthat are appropriately punctuated with few spellings or typing error. The writing is fluent and coherent with very good presentation exhibiting grammatically correct sentencesthat are appropriately punctuated with minor spelling or typing error The writing is fluent and coherent with excellent presentation exhibiting grammatically correct sentences that are appropriately punctuated with no minor spelling or typing errorReferencing(15 marks)Insufficient in-text citation format fails to apply APIC Harvard style of referencing. show some correct in-text citation and some adherence to APIC assessment presentation guidelines and APIC Harvard style of referencing. Mostly includes correct in-text citation and mostly adheres to APIC assessment presentation guidelines and APIC Harvard style of referencing. Assignment completely adheres to APIC assessmentpresentation guidelines with few inconsistencies with APIC Harvard style of referencing. Assignment completely adheres to APIC assessment presentation guidelines and APIC Harvard style of referencing.Page | 7Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111PRV12007; CRICOS 03048DApproved: 14/02/2019, Version 1

Order from Australian Expert Writers
Best Australian Academic Writers

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts

(USA, AUS, UK & CA Ph. D. Writers)

CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS

Order from Australian Expert Writers
Best Australian Academic Writers

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

YOU MAY ALSO READ ...  Quantitative Article Analysis