Assessment Task 1: Case Study Marking RubricMAT10706 Project AssignmentBIZ201 Accounting for Decision MakingQuantum ComputingBUS307 COMMERCIAL BANKINGAssessment 3: Health AssessmentTemplate for Analyzing the LogicNSB303 Partnerships in Health and IllnessCalculate the derivatives

SOLUTION AT Australian Expert Writers

Assessment Task 1: Case Study Marking Rubric 50%
Criterion
High Destinction (≥85%)
Distinction
(75-84%)
Credit
(65-74%)
Pass
(50-64%)
Fail
(≤49%)
Q1: Identify the
biopsychosocial, spiritual
and cultural impacts of
Ted’s surgery for him and
his family
(15%)
Provides comprehensive
understanding of the
biopsychosocial, spiritual
and cultural factors
influencing care for Ted
and his family
(12.75 – 15)
Provides a solid
undertanding of the
biopsychosocial, spiritual
and cultural factors
influencing care for Ted
and his family
(11.25 – 12.74)
Provides an
understanding of the
biopsychosocial, spiritual
and cultural factors
influencing care for Ted
and his family
(9.75 – 11.24)
Provides minimal
understanding of the
biopsychosocial, spiritual
and cultural factors
influencing care for Ted
and his family
(7.5- 9.74)
Does not identify
biopsychosocial, spiritual
and cultural factors
inlfuencing care for Ted
and his family
(0 – 7.4)
Q2: Provide responses to
stages three Process the
information and stage
four Identify Problems
(30%)
Provides comprehensive
discussion and
identification of the
underlying
pathophysiology and
identifies 2 or more
patient problems justified
by literature and Strong
links to case study
(25.5 – 30)
Provides a solid
discussion and
indentification of the
underlying
pathophysiology and
identifies 2 or more
patient problems justified
by literature and links to
case study.
(22.5 – 25.4)
Provides some discussion
of the pathophysiology
and identifies 2 patient
problems with some
justification by literature
and some links to case
study
(19.5 – 22.4)
Provides minimal
discussion, and
identification of the
underlying
pathophysiology and
identifies 2 patient
problem with weak links
to literature and minimal
links to case study.
(15-19.4)
Does not discuss
adequately the
underlying
pathophysiology,
identified 1 or no
problems. Inadequate
use of literature and
discussion not linked to
case study.
(0 – 14.9)
Q3: Establish goals outline
and justify (5) nursing
care interventions/
strategies the registered
nurse would implement
to provide care for Ted.
Justify with
evidence/literature to
support.
(30%)
Patient care goals clearly
identified using SMART
objectives. (5) nursing
care interventions stated.
The care plan was
articulate, logical,
balanced and convincing.
All important aspects are
covered demonstrating
comprehensive
knowledge of the key
areas. A strong attempt
at analysis and critique.
(25.5 – 30)
Patient care goals clearly
identified using SMART
ojectives. (5) nursing care
interventions stated
The care plan was
cohesive, logical and
balanced. demonstrating
great knowledge of the
key areas. A sound
attempt at analysis and
critique from
(22.5 – 25.4)
Patient care goals clearly
identified. (5) nursing
care interventions stated.
The care plan was
cohesive and logical. A
number of key areas are
covered demonstrating
an understanding of the
important issues. Some
attempt at analysis and
critique was made.
(19.5 – 22.4)
Patient care goals
adequately identified (5)
nursing care
interventions stated. A
logical care plan was
presented but mostly
descriptive. Some
structure to ideas with
satisfactory explanation
of some key areas
provided. A basic
understanding was
demonstrated.
(15-19.4)
Less than (5) nursing care
interventions stated.
There is little/no
cohesion to the flow of
the case study. Broad
generalisations are
made. Irrelevant content
and unstructured points
are made. Key areas are
not addressed. Minimal
understanding is
demonstrated.
(0 – 14.9)
Q4: select two classes of
drugs that would be used
to manage Ted’s Post
operative condition.
Please provide a rationale
for why that drug class
would be suitable or ted.
(15%)
Two (2) classes of drugs
appropriately identified
with rationale of benefits.
A comprehensive
understanding and
explanation of the
pharmaco-dynamic,
potential side effects and
nursing implications for
administration are
provided
(12.75 – 15)
Two (2) classes of drugs
appropriately identified
with rationale of benefits.
A detailed understanding
of the pharmaco
dynamic, potential side
effects and nursing
implications for
administration are
provided
(11.25 – 12.74)
Two (2) classes of drugs
appropriately identified
with some rationale
provided.
Some understanding of
pharmaco-dynamic,
potential side effects and
nursing implications for
administration are
provided
(9.75 – 11.24)
Two (2) classes of drugs
appropriately identified
no rationale provided.
Minimal identification of
pharmaco-dynamic,
potential side effects and
nursing implications for
administration are
provided
(7.5- 9.74)
Drugs classes identified
not appropriate and no
rationale.
No identification of
pharmaco-dynamic,
potential side effects and
nursing implications for
administration are
provided
.
(0 – 7.4)
Mechanis- Grammar,
spelling and punctuation
(5%)
There are no errors with
grammar, spelling and
punctuation that impact
readability, and the
meaning is easily
discernible. The case
study reads without
interruption.
(4.25 – 5)
There are no errors with
grammar, spelling and
punctuation that impact
readability, and the
meaning is easily
discernible.
(3.75 – 4.2)
There are minimal errors
with grammar, spelling
and punctuation that
impact readability, and
the meaning is easily
discernible.
(3.25 – 3.7)
There are some errors
with grammar, spelling
and punctuation that
impact readability.
However, the meaning is
discernible.
(2.5 – 3.2)
There are substantial
errors with grammar,
spelling and punctuation
that impact readability.
The errors detract
significantly, but the
meaning is discernible
(0 – 2.4)
Referencing
(5%)
All In text citations and
reference list are correct
and use APA style.
Textbooks, authoritative
websites, systematic
reviews and journal
articles provided.
(4.25 – 5)
One error in the in text
citation and/or reference
list (Based on APA style).
Textbooks, authoritative
websites and journal
articles provided.
(3.75 – 4.2)
Two errors in the in text
citation and/or reference
list (Based on APA style).
Textbooks and
authoritative websites
provided.
(3.25 – 3.7)
Three errors in the in text
citation and/or reference
list (Based on APA style)
Textbooks provided.
(2.5 – 3.2)
Four or more errors on
the in text citation,
referencing style and/or
reference list (Based on
APA style). Use of
unauthoritative
references (e.g.
Wikipedia).
(0 – 2.4)

Order from Australian Expert Writers
Best Australian Academic Writers

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts

(USA, AUS, UK & CA Ph. D. Writers)

CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS

Order from Australian Expert Writers
Best Australian Academic Writers

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

YOU MAY ALSO READ ...  List six questions you would ask/laboratory tests you would order or physical examinations you would perform to evaluate the eff...