Hit The Order Button To Order A **Custom Paper**

>> CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS FROM AustralianExpertWriters.com <<

5 Feb
2020

Marking Rubric Criteria Session 1,2020 | Good Grade Guarantee!

NUR272 Marking Rubric Criteria Session 1, 2020: Task 2 case study(1800 words +/- 10%)
Knowledgeable: Accurate nursing assessment using the Corbin and Strauss illness Trajectory Model reasoned to the goal of management . (20 Marks)
HD: A detailed nursing assessment with tailored alignment to a current health need (problem). The explanation of the goal of management using the Corbin and Strauss Trajectory model is clear and expresses cohesive knowledge.
DN: Well structured nursing assessment with detail that aligns a current health need.The explanation of the goal of management using the Corbin and Strauss illness Trajectory model is well crafted with key concepts identified.
CR: A credential nursing assessment that demonstrates practical application to a current health need. The Explanation of the goal of management using the Corbin and Strauss illness Trajectory model promotes understanding.
PS: A nursing assessment is identified to a current health need. there is an explanation of the goal of management using of the Corbin and Stauss illness model to guide interventions.
FL: Illustration of an appropriate nursing assessment is poorly conveyed , and ineffectively aligns to a current health need. The explanations of the goal of management using the Corbin and Strauss illness Trajectory Model is very week or missing.
Decision Making and Critical Thinking: Demonstrate critical thinking in the decision making ,care planning ,care delivery and management which align to the socioecological framework. (20 Marks)
HD: The provision of care demonstrates safe proficiency as ideas/actions/activities are tailored and relevant. There is optimal use of health services, and use of discipline involvement and resources . Correctly align to each environment with in the socioecological framework.
DN : The provision of care is realistic and attainable as ideas/actions/activities are coherent and with merit. There is clear use of health services , and relevant use of discipline involvement and resources aligning to each environment with in the socioecological framework.
CR: The provision of care has credibility as the ideas/actions/activities are logically outlined. There is promoted a use of health services, and merit to the selected discipline involvement and resource aligning to each environment within the socioecolegical framework.
PS: The provision of care is defined and ideas/actions/activities are reasoned. There is identification and use discipline involvement and resources aligning to each environment within the socioecological framework.
FL: the provision of care is either lacking focus or demonstrates unsafe practice. Poor understanding and use of health services ,incorrect discipline involvement and resources which are poorly aligned to each environment within the socioecological framework causing unsafe practice.
Rationale Factors: Provide the rationales for factors that may facilitate(contribute to) or hinder goals in the management of the case. (20 Marks)
HD: Factors that may facilitate (contribute to) or hinder goals are consistent and interpreted in relation to the case are exemplary.
DN: Factors that may facilitate (contribute to) or hinder goals are explained to the case are proficient.
CR: Factors that may facilitate (contribute to) or hinder goals are discussed to concepts of the case and are satisfactory.
PS: Factors that may facilitate (contribute to) or hinder goals in the management of the case are at a descriptive level.
FL: Factors that may facilitate (contribute to) or hinder goals in either lacking or very poorly explained.
Information Literacy: Communicates effectively in the academic context with appropriate presentation of the case using correct academic language. (20 Marks)
HD: Communication endorses clear ideas with a depth of explanation. Uses professional dialogue at an exemplary standard that skillfully communicates meanings with clarity. Academic language brings credibility to support thought and interpretation behind claims.
DN: Communication endorses sensible ideas with validation. Uses professional dialogue at a proficiency standard as words,phrases, sentences and paragraphs and arranged to create logical sequences.Academic language has support to descriptions and bring some credibility behind claims.
CR: Communication endorses ideas. Uses professional dialogue at a satisfactory standard as word s, phrases, sentences and paragraphs are arranged but some omissions can be recognized Academic language is appropriate to the claims.
PS: Communication effectively in the academic context with appropriate presentation of the case with minor errors in academic language.
FL: Does not communicate effectively in the academic context with appropriate presentation of the care, incorrect language is several areas and information presentation requires further consideration in planning. There is strong evidence of plagiarism / collusion.
Referencing : Apply the Harvard referencing format and uses current peer reviewed sources to support this assessment.
HD: Exemplary: Harvard style of referencing is applied peer reviewed journal’s are current (<5yars) with at least 12 articles used . references are correctly cited in text and within referencing list.
DN: Proficient : Harvard style referencing is applied ,peer reviewed journals are current (5 years) with at least 10 articles used. There are minor errors in referencing in text citations and within reference list.
CR: Satisfactory : Harvard style of referencing is applied , peer reviewed journals are current (<5 years ) with at least 8 articles used. There are some irregularities evident in the in text citations and within reference list.
PS: Pass. Harvard referencing format and peer reviewed sources are used . Selection of references needs further consideration . Several references are incorrectly cited in text and written the reference list .
FL: Multiple errors in referencing, selection are non academic / heavily web based or considered older than required .There is a need to contact . My organisation/ academic skills services and Academic skills.

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL – NO PLAGIARISM.

  • **REMEMBER TO PRECISE PAGE NUMBER**
  • Hit The Order Button To Order A **Custom Paper**

>> 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS FROM AustralianExpertWriters.com <<