Hit The Order Button To Order A **Custom Paper**

>> CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS FROM AustralianExpertWriters.com <<

16 Jan
2020

The purpose of this report is to solve a business problem using a theoretical framework informed by academic journal articles – NO PLAGIARISM

his is an individual assessmentDo not work with anyone else to complete this assignment or share any part of your assignment withanyone else – this is collusion and can result in a grade of 0 for the assessmentTable of ContentsTask Overview and Instructions 2Purpose: 2DISCLAIMER: 2Topic information: Job stress 3The Report Structure must be: 4See the Marking Criteria sheet on the next page 5Task Overview and InstructionsPurpose:The purpose of this report is to solve a business problem using a theoretical framework informed byacademic journal articles. Using academic journal articles, you will provide information regarding thebusiness problems and offer potential explanations for the business issues. Using what you have learned inthe lectures and tutorials, you will analyse the transcripts provided to identify the source of the business1/16/2020 52957 – https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-07-09/university-cheating-crackdown-could-mean-fines-for-family/11289742Thishttps://www.australiabesttutors.com/Recent_Question/52957/https–www-abc-net-au-news-2019-07-09-university-cheating 3/9problems. You will then make recommendations based on your findings and the literature to the CEO ofthe company. This will give you transferrable skills to your future jobs and let you practice creating abusiness report.In short:This is a qualitative business report. You, the researcher, have talked to the organisation. You uncoveredthe business problem and wrote about it in the introduction of the report. You then conducted a literaturereview to see what academic studies say about the business problem. The literature review also includesJob Demand Resource Theory as a perspective about the business problem.You went to the organisation and conducted a series of interviews. You now have the transcripts whichyou must code for themes. The findings are then reported in the results section of the business report. Thebusiness report then needs to conclude with recommendations based on the literature, theory, and findings.Note this is a time line of events so the results should not appear before the results section.DISCLAIMER:This is a work of fiction. The materials and information for this assignment are used for educationalpurposes only and are not a critique of any company or any affiliated companies. The opinions and viewsexpressed in this document are a work of fiction and do not represent the University of the SunshineCoast’s policy or opinion. All characters and data are fictional.The following is based on a real company – University of the Sunshine Coast, but this report and topic isfictional.This topic is to give you a real-world company with a fictional issue.DO NOT CONTACT THIS COMPANY FOR HELP WITH YOUR ASSIGNMENTTopic information: Job stressImage source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-07-09/university-cheating-crackdown-could-mean-finesfor-family/11289742You are creating a business report for the Business school Deputy Head of Learning and Teaching at theUniversity of the Sunshine Coast of USC. It must be professional in presentation and contain insightfulcontent for the Deputy Head of Learning and Teaching to make business decisions.The Business school Deputy Head of Learning and Teaching is concerned by a recent ABC News Report:https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-07-09/university-cheating-crackdown-could-mean-fines-forfamily/11289742The Business school Deputy Head of Learning and Teaching wants to know whether the comments in theABC report concerning contract cheating and other issues related to academic integrity are true and whatimpact this is having on academic staff?Image source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-07-09/university-cheating-crackdown-could-mean-finesfor-family/11289742Please view the university website for more information concerning the business school(www.usc.edu.au).The Business School has been facing issues of Student Academic Misconduct and this has contributed toincreased administrative workload, time pressure and individual stress for full-time and sessionalacademic staff. There are implications for the business school in terms of managing workload andallocation of resources and the Deputy Head is interested in how this should be managed.Student academic misconduct means that students have been copying from other sources or workingtogether to complete individual assessment. Academic misconduct is any action or attempted action thatmay result in creating an unfair academic advantage for oneself or another student. This could include:– Plagiarism is defined as use of intellectual material produced by another person without acknowledgingits sourceo Copying and pasting without paraphrasing and referencing the source1/16/2020 52957 – https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-07-09/university-cheating-crackdown-could-mean-fines-for-family/11289742Thishttps://www.australiabesttutors.com/Recent_Question/52957/https–www-abc-net-au-news-2019-07-09-university-cheating 4/9o Self-plagiarism– Collusion is defined as working with any other person to complete an individual assessment.o Acquiring or commissioning worko including giving away, swapping, or providing for sale your own worko asking someone to write your assignmento using a previous student’s assignmento sharing writing with your friendsAcademic misconduct is a very serious issue as it means that students are not learning Academic Integrityor the knowledge they need for their future job roles. See: https://www.usc.edu.au/currentstudents/student-news/2018/may/academic-integrity-because-honesty-is-the-best-policyThe focus of this research is the impact this is having on academic staff in terms of job demand andresources. The Deputy Head would like to understand how and why academic misconduct is contributingto stress for academic staff.You have interviewed six academic staff members from USC. The interviews lasted approximately 30-50minutes. The interviews were conducted onsite at USC in a quiet meeting room. The transcripts areavailable in a file labelled “BUS101_anonymous transcripts”.You need to code the transcripts for common themes, create a table and graph as shown in lecture 5 andtutorial week 5.For the report you must paraphrase the above information, i.e. put it in your own words – do not directlycopy and paste. You can add additional information, for example what kind of interview style did you use?The literature review needs to explore JDR theory and workplace stress as a result of poor levels ofacademic integrity (and other sources of academic stress if appropriate) identified in the ABC newsarticle. You need to present JDR theory from the perspective of academic staff members. Think about theresources and demands that the academic staff have access to and how the limited nature of resources andimpact of demands might affect academic staff.Theory: Job demand Resources theory (JD-R)Reading to start:1. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and lookingforward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273.You must locate multiple readings regarding the topic and the theory. A minimum of eight articles shouldbe cited.The Report Structure must include:? Cover page/Title Page – Name, student number, tutor name/day/time, word count? Executive summary (one page in length and single spaced) – overview the purpose, type ofanalysis/methods, most important findings in summary, most important conclusions andrecommendations. Look at how journal articles write an abstract as this is similar.? Table of contents (should also include a list of figures / tables if used)? Introduction (estimated 150 words):o Overview of the business problems? Introduce the company and what it does? Provide a statement of the business problems from the symptoms (see lecture 1-3 on how to do thisproperly)? Include a table which outlines the: Firms situation, Symptoms, Likely Problems, Decision statement,Research objectives, and a research question? Overview of literature on the topic (Estimated 800 words):? Write a literature review that overviews what previous empirical work (journal articles) has foundregarding the topic – see the lecture on literature reviews week 4.? Overview the theory you will use to investigate the business problems:• Overview the theory and explain the concepts and elements of the theory• Justify why this theory helps to explain the business problems• Write a managerial decision statement and corresponding research objectives and research questions1/16/2020 52957 – https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-07-09/university-cheating-crackdown-could-mean-fines-for-family/11289742Thishttps://www.australiabesttutors.com/Recent_Question/52957/https–www-abc-net-au-news-2019-07-09-university-cheating 5/9based on the theory and literature.• Do not include any results / transcripts in this section? Methods and Results (Estimated 500 words):o Introduce what qualitative analysis is (describe in one paragraph). Remember the audience may not haveany knowledge of what a qualitative analysis is. Make sure you use references to academic literature whendescribing it – do not just copy from the lecture notes (this is plagiarism).o Report what the method was and how the interview data was collected. Write in enough detail thatsomeone else can understand exactly what was done and how. Report on the internal/external validity (seelecture notes on qualitative research methods – this is mentioned a few times)o Present the findings of the analysis in a table AND figure, ensure you reflect on the findings andsummarise (do not just show a table/figure with no explanation). Refer to the lecture on qualitativeresearch methods – it shows you exactly how to report the results.? Recommendations and Conclusions (Estimated 500 words):o Based on the findings give the Business school Deputy Head of Learning and Teaching somerecommendations about how to improve the business problems. This must link to the academic literatureand theory from the introduction. You should also present the answer to your research question.? List of references – either APA or Harvard (choose one and be consistent)Report format:Font size 12, Times New roman, double spacing, and word count 2,000 (+/- 10% 1,800-2,200). Note. Theword count does not include the executive summary, headings, tables, graphs/figures, the reference list orappendices.See the Marking Criteria sheet on the next pageLevels of AchievementCriteria High Distinction85 to 100 % Distinction75 to 84 % Credit65 to 74 % Pass50 to 64 % Fail0 to 49 %Criteria 1:Executive summary(2 marks)The executive summary is concise and covers all of the elements regarding: an overview the purpose,methods and type of analysis, the most important findings in summary, the most important conclusionsand recommendations. It is not longer than one page and does not have any quotations or headings. It is astand-alone document that encompasses the important points of the report.The executive summary covers most of the elements regarding: an overview the purpose, methods andtype of analysis, the most important findings in summary, the most important conclusions andrecommendations. It is not longer than one page and does not have any quotations or headings. It is astand-alone document that mostly encompasses the important points of the report.The executive summary covers some of the elements regarding: an overview the purpose, methods andtype of analysis, the most important findings in summary, the most important conclusions andrecommendations.There might be instances of missing information or important points that were not mentioned. The lengthmight be slightly longer than one page and it does not have any quotations or headings. It is a stand-alonedocument that mostly covers the important points of the report. Basic elements of the executive summaryare covered with an overview of the purpose, methods and analysis, some of the findings, someconclusions and recommendations.There might be instances of missing information or important points that were not mentioned. The lengthmight be slightly longer than one page and it does not have any quotations or headings. It is a stand-alone1/16/2020 52957 – https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-07-09/university-cheating-crackdown-could-mean-fines-for-family/11289742Thishttps://www.australiabesttutors.com/Recent_Question/52957/https–www-abc-net-au-news-2019-07-09-university-cheating 6/9document that mostly covers the important points of the report. Little or no knowledge of an executivesummary. The important elements are not covered or there is an attempt, but several elements are missing.Criteria 2:Introduction(3 marks)85 to 100 %Demonstrates comprehensive and insightful knowledge of the business with an in-depth introduction tothe business and the problems. The introduction covers who the company is, what it does, and what theprofile is. A table is presented which includes all of the following elements: firms’ situation, symptoms,likely problems, decision statement, research objectives and research questions. All of the elements of thetable are discussed in-depth and well explained.75 to 84 %Demonstrates mostly comprehensive and insightful knowledge of the business. Most elements of thebusiness are covered such as, what the business does, and what the company profile is. A table ispresented which includes all of the following elements: firms’ situation, symptoms, likely problems,decision statement, research objectives and research questions. The elements of the table are reasonablydiscussed with some elements missing (1 at most).65 to 74 %Demonstrates some knowledge of the business with the problems mostly outlined. Most elements of thebusiness are covered such as, what the business does, and what the company profile is – but some mightbe missing. A table is presented which includes most of the following elements: firms’ situation,symptoms, likely problems, decision statement, research objectives and research questions. The elementsof the table are discussed with some elements missing (2-3 not discussed well). 50 to 64 %Basic knowledge of the business demonstrated with the assignment information given but no extrainformation included. A table is presented which includes most of the following elements: firms’ situation,symptoms, likely problems, decision statement, research objectives and research questions. The elementsof the table are discussed with some elements missing (3+ not discussed well).0 to 49 %Little or no knowledge of the business. Does not introduce the business or fails to explain the business andits problems. A table of the business problem steps and definition has not been included. Or it is includedand there are several elements missing or not explained.Criteria 3: Literature review (5 marks) The literature is very well integrated to show how the theory relatesto these business issues and what empirical research has shown regarding the business issues. Theliterature review is well referenced throughout. The theory is overviewed in detail with each elementexplained. The issues of the business are explained by using the theory and this is well integrated. Thissection ends with a managerial decision statement and corresponding research objectives and researchquestions. The literature review overviews empirical research and introduces a theory to explain thebusiness problems. Empirical research is presented that explains some of the business issues. Theliterature is fairly well referenced throughout. The theory is well overviewed but there might be somemissing instances. The section ends with a research question, but other elements are missing. Someempirical research is reviewed but it is lacking or disjointed. Introduces a theory to explain the problemswith some references to the literature. The literature is well referenced. But there is not too much detail tolink the business issues to what the literature and theory says. The section ends with some of thefollowing: a managerial decision statement and corresponding research objectives and research questionsbut some or most elements are missing. Some attempt to show what the literature says about the changesin the company, but references are lacking, or the writing is disjointed. Some attempt at introducing atheory to explain the issues. There are not enough references to cover the issue of the business problemsvery well. The section ends with at least one of the following: a managerial decision statement andcorresponding research objectives and research questions but some or most elements are missing.Does not show what the literature says about the changed in the company. Does not introduce a theory toexplain the business issues. Little to no references to the literature. The writing is poor and does not1/16/2020 52957 – https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-07-09/university-cheating-crackdown-could-mean-fines-for-family/11289742Thishttps://www.australiabesttutors.com/Recent_Question/52957/https–www-abc-net-au-news-2019-07-09-university-cheating 7/9convey much meaning. The topic was not followed, or the incorrect theory is presented. Did not followthe report outline. Did not show: a managerial decision statement and corresponding research objectivesand research questions most elements are missing.Criteria 4: Results(10 marks)Demonstrates comprehensive and insightful knowledge of the use of qualitative business analytic tools toanalyse the transcripts.The methodology is well detailed that it could be replicated. The internal/external validity are overviewed.The results are insightful and show all of the concepts taught in the course regarding: coding, presentationof results, and reliability/validity issues are addressed. Use of terminology is extensive and correct. Thelevel of interpretation of the data meets professional standards of the discipline with no errors ininterpretation and/or presentation. Demonstrates mostly comprehensive and insightful knowledge of theuse of qualitative business analytic tools to analyse the transcripts.The methodology is fairly well detailed that it could be replicated. The internal/external validity areoverviewed. The results are insightful and show most of the concepts taught in the course regarding:coding, presentation of results, and reliability/validity issues are addressed. Use of terminology isextensive and mostly correct. The level of interpretation of the data meets professional standards of thediscipline with no errors in interpretation and/or presentation. Demonstrates some knowledge of the use ofthe use of qualitative business analytic tools to analyse the transcripts.The methodology is mostly detailed that it could be reproduced. The internal/external validity arementioned. The results are mostly insightful and show most of the concepts taught in the course, althoughsome elements might be missing, regarding coding, presentation of results, and reliability/validity issues.Use of terminology is shown and mostly correct. The level of interpretation of the data meets professionalstandards of the discipline with some errors in interpretation and/or presentation. Basic knowledge of theuse of qualitative business analytic tools to analyse the transcripts.The methodology is somewhat outlined and might be reproduced, some omissions or errors present. Useof discipline terminology fairly correct. The level of interpretation of the findings meets standards butsome errors in interpretation or presentation. Most of the concepts taught in the course are shown,although some elements might be missing, regarding coding, presentation of results, andreliability/validity issues. The level of interpretation of the data meets professional standards of thediscipline with some errors in interpretation and/or presentation. Little or no knowledge of the use ofbusiness qualitative business analytic tools to analyse the transcripts is shown. The use of terminology isinconsistent and not correct. The level of interpretation of the data fails in terms of presentation andinterpretation with many errors and omissions. The methodology is not outlined or is missing informationso that it cannot be reproduced. Very few of the concepts taught in the course have been demonstrated.The level of interpretation of the data is lacking or elements are missing. The interpretation andpresentation fails to meet professional standards with many errors or missing elements.Criteria 5: Recommendations and Conclusions (5 marks) The recommendations are highly appropriatebased on the business issues, integrated with the results, and supported by the theory and literature. Theentire report is presented as a consistent whole from introduction to conclusions. The recommendationsare appropriate, based on the business problems, integrated with the results and literature. The report readsas consistent. The recommendations are fairly appropriate and fairly supported by the findings, literatureand theory. With some instances missing and/or lacking support from either the literature or theory. Therecommendations are appropriate, however lacking some instances and needing more. Or inappropriatesuggestions are made. Bullet points have been used instead of whole paragraphs. The theory/literature ismentioned but not well integrated. The recommendations are lacking and are not supported but thefindings, literature or theory. Inappropriate suggestions are made or there are no suggestions at all. Bulletpoints are presented instead of whole paragraphs. The report does not read as a consistent throughout.Criteria 6:Report formatting(5 marks)1/16/2020 52957 – https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-07-09/university-cheating-crackdown-could-mean-fines-for-family/11289742Thishttps://www.australiabesttutors.com/Recent_Question/52957/https–www-abc-net-au-news-2019-07-09-university-cheating 8/9The meaning is consistently clear. Use of discipline terminology is confident and assured. The level ofpresentation meets professional standards of the discipline, and there is a high level of attention to detailregarding the results tables/graphics. Little/no errors in grammar, syntax and spelling. Referencing andcitations are appropriate and very well integrated. The meaning is clear. Use of discipline terminology isextensive and largely correct. The level of presentation meets professional standards of the discipline, andthere is attention to detail. The tables/graphs are professional. The grammar, syntax and spelling are nearperfect. Referencing and citations are appropriate/integrated. Overall meaning is clear though there areminor instances of awkward/ambiguous expression. Use of discipline terminology is adequate. The levelof presentation mostly meets professional standards of the discipline, with some lapses in detail, grammar,syntax and spelling is good. Some referencing and/or citation errors. The intended meaning can bediscerned but lacks clarity and/or examples of awkward/ambiguous expression. Limited disciplineterminology with minor inaccuracies. Some professionalism but significant lapses in grammar, syntax, andspelling. Referencing and/or citation errors. Use of language fails to make meaning clear; many errors ofgrammar, syntax and spelling, range of mistakes indicating lack of editing and proofreading. Limited orincorrect use of discipline terminology. Poor referencing and citation errors. Elements of the report aremissing/incomplete.

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL – NO PLAGIARISM.

  • **REMEMBER TO PRECISE PAGE NUMBER**
  • Hit The Order Button To Order A **Custom Paper**

>> 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS FROM AustralianExpertWriters.com <<